![]() |
How the Transgender Rights Movement Bet on the Supreme Court and Lost - Printable Version +- clovenhooves (https://clovenhooves.org) +-- Forum: The Personal Is Political (https://clovenhooves.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Gender Critical (https://clovenhooves.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: How the Transgender Rights Movement Bet on the Supreme Court and Lost (/showthread.php?tid=1290) |
How the Transgender Rights Movement Bet on the Supreme Court and Lost - MenacinglyLavender - Jun 19 2025 NYT Article Archive Quote:Others, however, saw the Skrmetti case as a tragic gamble built on flawed politics and uncertain science. Over the last decade, they told me, the movement was consumed by theories of sex and gender that most voters didn’t grasp or support, radicalizing its politics just as the culture wars reignited and the Supreme Court began moving further right. And as Skrmetti and other lawsuits made their way through federal courts, some of the central medical claims girding the legal case for pediatric gender treatments — that decades of thorough study had found them to be safe and effective — began to unravel amid growing scrutiny by other doctors and experts. Warning that this article is LONG. But super informative, and goes in depth over the many errors the trans rights movement has made over the years - and how they’re now reaping the consequences. I thought it was balanced (definitely more so than NYT’s “The Protocol” podcast, though that is also worth a listen) and thorough, however I maintain the complaint that the NYT once again did not touch the fact that most dysphoric children are same-sex attracted. RE: How the Transgender Rights Movement Bet on the Supreme Court and Lost - MenacinglyLavender - Jun 19 2025 This gem is feeling especially relevant…. Quote:In recent months, Strangio and other trans activists have pleaded for broader public solidarity with their cause, arguing that the defense of gender-affirming care is closely intertwined with the defense of reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy for women. But when I asked Romero if the A.C.L.U. had consulted with women’s rights groups before bringing Skrmetti — with its high-stakes claims about sex-discrimination protections — before the Supreme Court, he seemed impatient. “I don’t play ‘Mother May I?’ with a group of sister organizations,” Romero said. “I don’t run a peer-review journal. I make the best decisions for this organization on its own.” RE: How the Transgender Rights Movement Bet on the Supreme Court and Lost - Elsacat - Jun 20 2025 From the article: “I didn’t pick this fight around trans rights,” Anthony Romero, the A.C.L.U.’s executive director, told me in an interview not long before the decision. “The right-wing conservatives of the MAGA G.O.P. have made this one of their cause célèbre issues as a way to kind of scapegoat individuals, as a way to score cheap political points.” Romero's not wrong but the problem is, that accusation goes both ways. Trans activists, progressives, Democrats also made this one of their cause célèbre issues as a way to kind of scapegoat individuals, as a way to score cheap political points. I also think Romero's dismissive comments about not consulting with women's rights groups points to people at the ACLU wanting to use this case to build their own profiles and legacies, as much or more than about doing what they thought was right for trans people. They wanted to be law-famous. And Romero clearly has a typically male attitude toward aligning with women: Get out of my way, ladies, I'm about to make history! RE: How the Transgender Rights Movement Bet on the Supreme Court and Lost - komorebi - Jun 20 2025 Such a good piece. Clear-eyed and very in depth. I thought the author's replies in the comments were also good. |