clovenhooves The Personal Is Political Institutional Sexism Article Misogyny Is 2025’s Biggest Trend

Article Misogyny Is 2025’s Biggest Trend

Article Misogyny Is 2025’s Biggest Trend

 
Feb 8 2025, 2:19 PM
#2
The irony is, parts of this article could be considered an 11th item on the list.

Quote: Zuck, who has three daughters if you were wondering, kicked off 2025 with a host of “anti-woke” initiatives, including radically upending the company’s fact-checking systems, rolling back diversity programs, and removing tampons, which had been provided for trans and nonbinary employees, from men’s bathrooms.


Now while I think taking easy-access tampons away from Meta-employee TIFs isn't a good thing (though let's be honest, nowadays most women are more likely to be carrying their own menstrual products with them than the loose change needed to buy them in bathrooms, no matter which one), I also don't think it's really that serious a concern and more just a "symbolic statement" by Zuckerberg (much like having tampons in the men's room was in the first place). Which is not something you could say about removing diversity hiring/programs, or the rest of the impacts on the list for that matter.

And no part of the article highlights this more than Number 6 (which comes right after the mention of the takedown of the federal reproductive health information website, btw), which describes the act of preventing TIP from being allowed a legal fiction of denying their actual sex using the words "devastatingly cruel" and "horrifying" while the fact that embryos (not even fetuses, fertilized eggs) are now legally considered full people, meaning abortion and miscarriages are now legally murder is just "rhetoric" that "aligns with... extreme anti-abortion legislation." It's like, "Fetuses are legally people now? Oh no! Anyway, the true human rights violation is that trans people can't lie to their doctors (who can and have literally accidentally killed them due to this lie) anymore!!!"

(To be clear, I'm very much capable of caring about multiple different issues of varying severities at the same time. In fact, this post is a great example: I don't think this one author slipping in fear-mongering about TIP and equating their wants to rights is anywhere near as bad as any item on the list. The difference with this specific ""issue"" is that it's the exact opposite of one. It's a solution to an issue, even.)

And to finish it all off, there's the ever-prevalent "we're all female at conception" lie at the end. Wowee! (Shameless plug: I actually just recently wrote a whole long post about how and why this is untrue, in @NotYourNigel's intersex thread!)


Like we really can't even have a "Top 10 Worst Misogynies of 2024 (#3 Will Make You Cry!)" list without mentioning trans-identified people's non-issues multiple times. I already felt hopeless enough about the state of the country based on the actual substance in this list, but then there has to be a "you're allowed to be sad about your rights being stolen from you, but please don't forget about trans-identified people in this trying time or ever at all" cherry on top, too. Good god.
Shroom
Feb 8 2025, 2:19 PM #2

The irony is, parts of this article could be considered an 11th item on the list.

Quote: Zuck, who has three daughters if you were wondering, kicked off 2025 with a host of “anti-woke” initiatives, including radically upending the company’s fact-checking systems, rolling back diversity programs, and removing tampons, which had been provided for trans and nonbinary employees, from men’s bathrooms.


Now while I think taking easy-access tampons away from Meta-employee TIFs isn't a good thing (though let's be honest, nowadays most women are more likely to be carrying their own menstrual products with them than the loose change needed to buy them in bathrooms, no matter which one), I also don't think it's really that serious a concern and more just a "symbolic statement" by Zuckerberg (much like having tampons in the men's room was in the first place). Which is not something you could say about removing diversity hiring/programs, or the rest of the impacts on the list for that matter.

And no part of the article highlights this more than Number 6 (which comes right after the mention of the takedown of the federal reproductive health information website, btw), which describes the act of preventing TIP from being allowed a legal fiction of denying their actual sex using the words "devastatingly cruel" and "horrifying" while the fact that embryos (not even fetuses, fertilized eggs) are now legally considered full people, meaning abortion and miscarriages are now legally murder is just "rhetoric" that "aligns with... extreme anti-abortion legislation." It's like, "Fetuses are legally people now? Oh no! Anyway, the true human rights violation is that trans people can't lie to their doctors (who can and have literally accidentally killed them due to this lie) anymore!!!"

(To be clear, I'm very much capable of caring about multiple different issues of varying severities at the same time. In fact, this post is a great example: I don't think this one author slipping in fear-mongering about TIP and equating their wants to rights is anywhere near as bad as any item on the list. The difference with this specific ""issue"" is that it's the exact opposite of one. It's a solution to an issue, even.)

And to finish it all off, there's the ever-prevalent "we're all female at conception" lie at the end. Wowee! (Shameless plug: I actually just recently wrote a whole long post about how and why this is untrue, in @NotYourNigel's intersex thread!)


Like we really can't even have a "Top 10 Worst Misogynies of 2024 (#3 Will Make You Cry!)" list without mentioning trans-identified people's non-issues multiple times. I already felt hopeless enough about the state of the country based on the actual substance in this list, but then there has to be a "you're allowed to be sad about your rights being stolen from you, but please don't forget about trans-identified people in this trying time or ever at all" cherry on top, too. Good god.

Clover
Kozlik's regular account 🍀🐐
665
Feb 9 2025, 12:12 AM
#3
How long have women lived under patriarchy? I don't think it only started in 2025, Stephanie... This author is being fooled, misogyny is always in fashion under patriarchy. This is the issue with the association that the right-wing = misogynistic, and therefore it must mean the "left-wing" = not misogynistic. (I put "left-wing" in quotes because, I mean, I believe that actual left-wing values are antithetical to misogyny, but alas, brogressives have "usurped the left-wing" and made people think it's woke-bro willy nonsense.) Left-wing misogyny is covert, right-wing misogyny is overt.

@Shroom Your addition to YYN's intersex post is awesome! So appreciative of women like you and YYN building up such resources. :meowheart:

And yes, the irony of an article that is supposed to be about misogyny needing to include transgenderism. lawl. Stephanie, you've been wearing the latest fashion... all this time... welcome to the Hotel California.

(Though I still do appreciate in general this documentation of misogyny since the start of 2025. Wow, what a year huh? Glad it's almost over... oh wait... :catcry:)
Clover
Kozlik's regular account 🍀🐐
Feb 9 2025, 12:12 AM #3

How long have women lived under patriarchy? I don't think it only started in 2025, Stephanie... This author is being fooled, misogyny is always in fashion under patriarchy. This is the issue with the association that the right-wing = misogynistic, and therefore it must mean the "left-wing" = not misogynistic. (I put "left-wing" in quotes because, I mean, I believe that actual left-wing values are antithetical to misogyny, but alas, brogressives have "usurped the left-wing" and made people think it's woke-bro willy nonsense.) Left-wing misogyny is covert, right-wing misogyny is overt.

@Shroom Your addition to YYN's intersex post is awesome! So appreciative of women like you and YYN building up such resources. :meowheart:

And yes, the irony of an article that is supposed to be about misogyny needing to include transgenderism. lawl. Stephanie, you've been wearing the latest fashion... all this time... welcome to the Hotel California.

(Though I still do appreciate in general this documentation of misogyny since the start of 2025. Wow, what a year huh? Glad it's almost over... oh wait... :catcry:)

Feb 9 2025, 9:34 AM
#4
I don't love the "must include trans" aspects of the article but, in keeping with decentering trans in my life, I won't promote it but I also won't avoid sharing info that might also include pro-trans stuff, if I believe there's other valuable info. It sucks that it's hard to find sources that just focus on women without bringing trans into it either to promote or detract. Like...just talk about WOMEN.
Elsacat
Feb 9 2025, 9:34 AM #4

I don't love the "must include trans" aspects of the article but, in keeping with decentering trans in my life, I won't promote it but I also won't avoid sharing info that might also include pro-trans stuff, if I believe there's other valuable info. It sucks that it's hard to find sources that just focus on women without bringing trans into it either to promote or detract. Like...just talk about WOMEN.

Recently Browsing
 2 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 2 Guest(s)