News Judge overturns North Dakota's abortion ban, citing 'a woman's fundamental right'
News Judge overturns North Dakota's abortion ban, citing 'a woman's fundamental right'
Sep 13 2024, 1:48 PM
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/12/north-dakota-abortion-law-overturned-bruce-romanick/75195669007/
Quote:Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick ruled that the state's abortion law violates North Dakota Constitution's due process protections. But the nearest abortion provider is in Minnesota.
Quote:Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick ruled that the abortion ban, which went into effect after Roe v. Wade was overturned, violates due process protections under North Dakota's state Constitution.
“The North Dakota Constitution guarantees each individual, including women, the fundamental right to make medical judgments affecting his or her bodily integrity, health and autonomy, in consultation with a chosen health care provider free from government interference," Romanick wrote in the ruling.
“Unborn human life, pre-viability, is not a sufficient justification to interfere with a woman’s fundamental right,” Romanick continued. “Criminalizing pre-viability abortions is not necessary to promote the State’s interests in women’s health and protecting unborn human life.”
Discussion on Ovarit.
Kozlik's regular member account. 🐐🌼
USA Today, September 12 2024.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/09/12/north-dakota-abortion-law-overturned-bruce-romanick/75195669007/
Quote:Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick ruled that the state's abortion law violates North Dakota Constitution's due process protections. But the nearest abortion provider is in Minnesota.
Quote:Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick ruled that the abortion ban, which went into effect after Roe v. Wade was overturned, violates due process protections under North Dakota's state Constitution.
“The North Dakota Constitution guarantees each individual, including women, the fundamental right to make medical judgments affecting his or her bodily integrity, health and autonomy, in consultation with a chosen health care provider free from government interference," Romanick wrote in the ruling.
“Unborn human life, pre-viability, is not a sufficient justification to interfere with a woman’s fundamental right,” Romanick continued. “Criminalizing pre-viability abortions is not necessary to promote the State’s interests in women’s health and protecting unborn human life.”
Discussion on Ovarit.
Kozlik's regular member account. 🐐🌼
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)
1 Guest(s)