Types of Propaganda, Propaganda Techniques, and Propaganda Strategies
Types of Propaganda, Propaganda Techniques, and Propaganda Strategies
Fact / Myth, Thomas DeMichele, July 3, 2017
https://factmyth.com/types-of-propaganda/
A long but useful read, especially for navigating online politicial discourse.
Quick markdown cite: [*Types of Propaganda, Propaganda Techniques, and Propaganda Strategies*](https://factmyth.com/types-of-propaganda/)
Unicorn
Once you learn about these things, start identifying them in people's discussions, especially easy if you're just observing people debating and not actually in a debate itself so then there's less likelihood of having blindspots.
- Learn about logical fallacies
- Learn about cognitive distortions (it's a mental health thing but I find it relevant to logical fallacies and in discourse with people)
Note that just because someone uses fallacies or emotional thinking doesn't necessarily mean they're "wrong." (Also see: "fallacy fallacy" — sometimes people think just being able to call out fallacies makes them "right"/"win" the debate.) Also sometimes "right" or "wrong" is opinion-based or delves into ethics and morality type of stuff which goes into philosophy stuff.
Good to keep in mind:
Just keeping an open mind and being curious and willing to look deeper/ask questions is helpful.
- Why is someone saying something?
- What do they gain from saying that?
- Are they "sponsored" by an agency or government?
- Do I have an emotional reaction to what they're saying? If so, what emotion? Why that emotion?
- Am I willing to accept what they're saying or reject it? Why am I willing to accept/reject?
- Is there a side they are trying to vilify? Are they trying to discourage you from listening to the other side? Why? What does that side say?
I also like to recommend this article a lot: Types of Propaganda, Propaganda Techniques, and Propaganda Strategies
Referenced in this Vexxed post where someone asks about improving critical thinking skills: https://vexxed.org/o/Women/3548/critical-thinking-tips/c80313d4-d524-494d-a11f-c7fe04d4e0bc#comment-c80313d4-d524-494d-a11f-c7fe04d4e0bc
Unicorn
Once you learn about these things, start identifying them in people's discussions, especially easy if you're just observing people debating and not actually in a debate itself so then there's less likelihood of having blindspots.
- Learn about logical fallacies
- Learn about cognitive distortions (it's a mental health thing but I find it relevant to logical fallacies and in discourse with people)
Note that just because someone uses fallacies or emotional thinking doesn't necessarily mean they're "wrong." (Also see: "fallacy fallacy" — sometimes people think just being able to call out fallacies makes them "right"/"win" the debate.) Also sometimes "right" or "wrong" is opinion-based or delves into ethics and morality type of stuff which goes into philosophy stuff.
Good to keep in mind:
Just keeping an open mind and being curious and willing to look deeper/ask questions is helpful.
- Why is someone saying something?
- What do they gain from saying that?
- Are they "sponsored" by an agency or government?
- Do I have an emotional reaction to what they're saying? If so, what emotion? Why that emotion?
- Am I willing to accept what they're saying or reject it? Why am I willing to accept/reject?
- Is there a side they are trying to vilify? Are they trying to discourage you from listening to the other side? Why? What does that side say?
I also like to recommend this article a lot: Types of Propaganda, Propaganda Techniques, and Propaganda Strategies