clovenhooves The Personal Is Political Women's Rights Discussion Your Favorite Reformists?

Discussion Your Favorite Reformists?

Discussion Your Favorite Reformists?

 
Impress Polly
The kind they warned you about.
216
Mar 27 2026, 8:58 PM
#1
This post was inspired by Elsacat's recent thread about more women deciding to run for office after participating in No Kings protests.

By now you know me: I'm not much of a reformist or a big believer in electoral politics and I just cannot make myself care about the fate of the Democratic Party as an institution. I'm actually morbidly grateful for Trump. He's been the greatest gift to radical feminists and everyone like them in generations! Trends like "decenter men" and "going boy-sober" and whatnot would be nowhere near the cultural mainstream today if it weren't for his cartoonish misogynistic buffoonery and the kind of clarity that comes from moids loving it so much. Still, reforms can be useful in as far as they might shift the culture in a way that generates more class consciousness among women. If they serve to help create a revolutionary culture, they are useful and worth pursuing.

I'm an American and what they call a low-propensity Democratic voter. I'm an independent who voted in half of the six presidential elections I've been eligible to do so in, for example, always unenthusiastically for Democrats. 2008 was my last vote for a male candidate. For anything. I vote only for women nowadays. That's a matter of principle. My political goal is to live in a society, nay a world, without men, and I vote in the most logically matching way that I can. It's not that being a woman means I'll support you, it's just a bare minimum requirement that gives you the opportunity for my vote. I think like men that way, but mirrored. Thus I am grateful for more women deciding to run for public office.

Who might I personally find it actually exciting to vote for? Well I have had my favorite elected reformists over the years. In the 2010s I was kind of a fan of New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who made it her (Gilli)brand to champion women's causes. It was she, for example, who introduced the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act (mandating paid family leave) and led the charge to remove sexual assault cases involving military personnel from the military's chain of command and proposed actual legislation to do things like get rid of corporate nondisclosure agreements and end forced arbitration in sexual harassment and assault cases in response to the #MeToo phenomenon, and who had the audacity to once suggest that yes, in fact Bill Clinton should have resigned the presidency after sexually exploiting an intern. In 2017, she was unique in voting against confirming any Trump nominees for any posts. In the 2020 presidential election when like a quarter of the Senate declared presidential ambitions, including Gillibrand, I considered her my first choice. Alas though, my priorities proved far from those of both Democratic donors and the voting public alike, as she quickly became I believe the first candidate to drop out. :meowderp: Apparently Democrats were bitter about her holding Democratic officials like Al Franken and Bill Clinton to the same standard as Republicans, so her campaign failed to gain traction. From there, my support defaulted to Elizabeth Warren, who ran a far more economist, Bernie Sanders-like campaign, until she too dropped out before it came time for my state to vote. Sanders, in turn, refused to commit to so much as choosing a female running mate; a commitment even the establishment candidate Joe Biden was willing to make. I wound up sitting out both the primary and the general election as a result.

In more recent years, Gillibrand has gone a very different direction that I've found less inspiring. She's become a crypto industry champion and, apparently feeling rebuked by her 2020 campaign, endorsed Andrew Cuomo for New York City mayor last year even after he'd resigned the governorship in disgrace after getting caught in numerous sex crimes. Credibility has been lost. She's just another politician to me now.

These days my fave member of Congress is Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett. She's a sharp-tongued  populist who supports Medicare-for-all, the Green New Deal, and just generally the standard Progressive Caucus economic positions popularized by Bernie Sanders, but can be differentiated from the Squad by her more nuanced positions on a range of social issues like immigration and foreign policy. Also co-chaired Kamala Harris's presidential campaign. She ran for the U.S. Senate this year, but was defeated in her party's primary by this man...

   

...or someone very much like him anyway because it is Texas. Anyway, I relate to her whole "progressive but not the Squad" image, like her willingness to speak her mind, and find her particular combination of positions especially favorable to women. (Notable to me: Her coalition of supporters was mainly working class women and feminists. No wonder I relate. It may also be notable that a certain likely 2028 candidate, Gavin Newsom, endorsed Talarico in that race while a likely top rival of his, Kamala Harris, endorsed Crockett. Symbolism portending things to come in wider Democratic politics perhaps.)

Tomorrow is of course the next No Kings protest. Before we go flip some tables like that barefoot rabbi though, what's your relationship to electoral politics? Do you have favorite elected officials?
Edited Mar 30 2026, 7:03 PM by Impress Polly.
Impress Polly
The kind they warned you about.
Mar 27 2026, 8:58 PM #1

This post was inspired by Elsacat's recent thread about more women deciding to run for office after participating in No Kings protests.

By now you know me: I'm not much of a reformist or a big believer in electoral politics and I just cannot make myself care about the fate of the Democratic Party as an institution. I'm actually morbidly grateful for Trump. He's been the greatest gift to radical feminists and everyone like them in generations! Trends like "decenter men" and "going boy-sober" and whatnot would be nowhere near the cultural mainstream today if it weren't for his cartoonish misogynistic buffoonery and the kind of clarity that comes from moids loving it so much. Still, reforms can be useful in as far as they might shift the culture in a way that generates more class consciousness among women. If they serve to help create a revolutionary culture, they are useful and worth pursuing.

I'm an American and what they call a low-propensity Democratic voter. I'm an independent who voted in half of the six presidential elections I've been eligible to do so in, for example, always unenthusiastically for Democrats. 2008 was my last vote for a male candidate. For anything. I vote only for women nowadays. That's a matter of principle. My political goal is to live in a society, nay a world, without men, and I vote in the most logically matching way that I can. It's not that being a woman means I'll support you, it's just a bare minimum requirement that gives you the opportunity for my vote. I think like men that way, but mirrored. Thus I am grateful for more women deciding to run for public office.

Who might I personally find it actually exciting to vote for? Well I have had my favorite elected reformists over the years. In the 2010s I was kind of a fan of New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, who made it her (Gilli)brand to champion women's causes. It was she, for example, who introduced the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act (mandating paid family leave) and led the charge to remove sexual assault cases involving military personnel from the military's chain of command and proposed actual legislation to do things like get rid of corporate nondisclosure agreements and end forced arbitration in sexual harassment and assault cases in response to the #MeToo phenomenon, and who had the audacity to once suggest that yes, in fact Bill Clinton should have resigned the presidency after sexually exploiting an intern. In 2017, she was unique in voting against confirming any Trump nominees for any posts. In the 2020 presidential election when like a quarter of the Senate declared presidential ambitions, including Gillibrand, I considered her my first choice. Alas though, my priorities proved far from those of both Democratic donors and the voting public alike, as she quickly became I believe the first candidate to drop out. :meowderp: Apparently Democrats were bitter about her holding Democratic officials like Al Franken and Bill Clinton to the same standard as Republicans, so her campaign failed to gain traction. From there, my support defaulted to Elizabeth Warren, who ran a far more economist, Bernie Sanders-like campaign, until she too dropped out before it came time for my state to vote. Sanders, in turn, refused to commit to so much as choosing a female running mate; a commitment even the establishment candidate Joe Biden was willing to make. I wound up sitting out both the primary and the general election as a result.

In more recent years, Gillibrand has gone a very different direction that I've found less inspiring. She's become a crypto industry champion and, apparently feeling rebuked by her 2020 campaign, endorsed Andrew Cuomo for New York City mayor last year even after he'd resigned the governorship in disgrace after getting caught in numerous sex crimes. Credibility has been lost. She's just another politician to me now.

These days my fave member of Congress is Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett. She's a sharp-tongued  populist who supports Medicare-for-all, the Green New Deal, and just generally the standard Progressive Caucus economic positions popularized by Bernie Sanders, but can be differentiated from the Squad by her more nuanced positions on a range of social issues like immigration and foreign policy. Also co-chaired Kamala Harris's presidential campaign. She ran for the U.S. Senate this year, but was defeated in her party's primary by this man...

   

...or someone very much like him anyway because it is Texas. Anyway, I relate to her whole "progressive but not the Squad" image, like her willingness to speak her mind, and find her particular combination of positions especially favorable to women. (Notable to me: Her coalition of supporters was mainly working class women and feminists. No wonder I relate. It may also be notable that a certain likely 2028 candidate, Gavin Newsom, endorsed Talarico in that race while a likely top rival of his, Kamala Harris, endorsed Crockett. Symbolism portending things to come in wider Democratic politics perhaps.)

Tomorrow is of course the next No Kings protest. Before we go flip some tables like that barefoot rabbi though, what's your relationship to electoral politics? Do you have favorite elected officials?

Clover
Kozlik's regular account 🍀🐐
1,562
Mar 29 2026, 6:36 PM
#2
Quote:I vote only for women nowadays. That's a matter of principle. My political goal is to live in a society, nay a world, without men, and I vote in the most logically matching way that I can. It's not that being a woman means I'll support you, it's just a bare minimum requirement that gives you the opportunity for my vote.

I sometimes do this. Especially in primaries and especially in races that I really have no preference. Just default to the woman cuz muahaha. The cases where I don't are when I read all the bios and think based on policy someone else is much more fitting. But if it's close, default to woman, lol.

My fav is Bernie Sanders cuz he got me into politics in 2016... :catcry: and I've been an active voter in almost every election since then. (I think I literally just missed one or two "special election" things for my country/distrcit/whatevs where it's like... literally just one boring levy and I honestly don't care which way it goes.) Elizabeth Warren is cool, in like, a "boring responsible" way I guess? lol. AOC iquite libfem but I do enjoy her quippiness.

Quote:She ran for the U.S. Senate this year, but was defeated in her party's primary by this man...

loooooool

Jasmine Crockett is cool. Even though she lost that primary, there's no way we have seen the last of her.
Edited Mar 29 2026, 6:37 PM by Clover.
Clover
Kozlik's regular account 🍀🐐
Mar 29 2026, 6:36 PM #2

Quote:I vote only for women nowadays. That's a matter of principle. My political goal is to live in a society, nay a world, without men, and I vote in the most logically matching way that I can. It's not that being a woman means I'll support you, it's just a bare minimum requirement that gives you the opportunity for my vote.

I sometimes do this. Especially in primaries and especially in races that I really have no preference. Just default to the woman cuz muahaha. The cases where I don't are when I read all the bios and think based on policy someone else is much more fitting. But if it's close, default to woman, lol.

My fav is Bernie Sanders cuz he got me into politics in 2016... :catcry: and I've been an active voter in almost every election since then. (I think I literally just missed one or two "special election" things for my country/distrcit/whatevs where it's like... literally just one boring levy and I honestly don't care which way it goes.) Elizabeth Warren is cool, in like, a "boring responsible" way I guess? lol. AOC iquite libfem but I do enjoy her quippiness.

Quote:She ran for the U.S. Senate this year, but was defeated in her party's primary by this man...

loooooool

Jasmine Crockett is cool. Even though she lost that primary, there's no way we have seen the last of her.

Mar 30 2026, 5:32 PM
#3
Seconding AOC and Crockett. I was never an AOC hater at all but I wasn't always a fan, either. I'm liking her more and more as time goes by. Jasmine Crockett, I liked from the start. Neither she nor AOC take bullshit lying down.  

I admire Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie's commitment to keeping the Epstein files high profile and demanding answers. 

I'm trying to figure out Marjorie Taylor-Greene. I don't trust her anti-MAGA pivot, but if it's legit, good for her for being willing to admit what crap it is and how it's damaging the country. I'm curious what has made her feel bold enough to speak out on that. It makes me think she has some strong but quiet backing somewhere. From who, or what, though? That's the part that concerns me.
Elsacat
Mar 30 2026, 5:32 PM #3

Seconding AOC and Crockett. I was never an AOC hater at all but I wasn't always a fan, either. I'm liking her more and more as time goes by. Jasmine Crockett, I liked from the start. Neither she nor AOC take bullshit lying down.  

I admire Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie's commitment to keeping the Epstein files high profile and demanding answers. 

I'm trying to figure out Marjorie Taylor-Greene. I don't trust her anti-MAGA pivot, but if it's legit, good for her for being willing to admit what crap it is and how it's damaging the country. I'm curious what has made her feel bold enough to speak out on that. It makes me think she has some strong but quiet backing somewhere. From who, or what, though? That's the part that concerns me.

Impress Polly
The kind they warned you about.
216
Apr 3 2026, 9:15 PM
#4
(Mar 29 2026, 6:36 PM)Clover
Quote:I vote only for women nowadays. That's a matter of principle. My political goal is to live in a society, nay a world, without men, and I vote in the most logically matching way that I can. It's not that being a woman means I'll support you, it's just a bare minimum requirement that gives you the opportunity for my vote.

I sometimes do this. Especially in primaries and especially in races that I really have no preference. Just default to the woman cuz muahaha. The cases where I don't are when I read all the bios and think based on policy someone else is much more fitting. But if it's close, default to woman, lol.

My fav is Bernie Sanders cuz he got me into politics in 2016... :catcry: and I've been an active voter in almost every election since then. (I think I literally just missed one or two "special election" things for my country/distrcit/whatevs where it's like... literally just one boring levy and I honestly don't care which way it goes.) Elizabeth Warren is cool, in like, a "boring responsible" way I guess? lol. AOC iquite libfem but I do enjoy her quippiness.

Quote:She ran for the U.S. Senate this year, but was defeated in her party's primary by this man...

loooooool

Jasmine Crockett is cool. Even though she lost that primary, there's no way we have seen the last of her.

Well we have something in common here: my first vote was for Bernie too.  :harold: Back in 2002, I voted to re-elect him to represent my state's one Congressional district in the House of Representatives, then in 2006 I voted to elect him to the Senate in his first run for that post. He was sorta my fav' American politician back in the 2000s, mostly because he had the audacity to call himself a socialist and run outside the two-party system. I've missed many elections since 2008 though. I don't see how you sustain the motivation.

Over the years, I've noticed that feminist waves in a given country often seem to arise adjacent the ascendancy of women to (or even just toward sometimes) head-of-state positions, almost regardless of their politics. I've discussed the Korean feminist wave of the 2010s at some length here. It's no coincidence that that happened during the presidency of Park Geun-hye (who was a conservative). However indirectly, the two things were certainly related in much the same way that the most intensive period of our fourth feminist wave (e.g. Women's March, Me Too, Female Dating Strategy, etc.) and the unexpected defeat of Hillary Clinton were closely associated things, nor is it a coincidence that Thailand currently has one of the proportionally highest feminist-identifying population shares in the world shortly after they briefly got their second female prime minister. Etc. Women are rarely elected to such positions. They often have to just inherit them in some form or fashion (like how Kamala Harris inherited her party's nomination a couple years back) because the world hates and distrusts women. The ones who do win typically serve either just one term or aren't allowed to even serve out their term. Mass protests erupt, they get impeached, a military coup or an assassination happens...something that for male leaders would be extraordinary happens very ordinarily to women. The anger of either the public, the political establishment, or both gets directed with disproportionate force and ferocity at female leaders. Liberals respond with particular viscousness to conservative women who attain to power and vice versa. This predictably psychotic, over-the-top reaction is often noticed by women and begets a backlash that has less to do with politics than it does with a determination to challenge sexism. Thus I find that electing female leaders has intrinsic value of its own in the way of exposing how ridiculously threatened people feel by the entire idea of women leading society.

Concerning AOC being a libfem...I mean they're all libfems. Like that's the only kind of feminist you're allowed to be at that level of visibility in America. That much is understood. The differences amongst them are a matter of degrees. What we're evaluating here hence is in essence the degrees. But anyway, addressing that more directly, I definitely like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a person, mostly because it's like you say: while she's gotten more polished and professional over the years, she's got an actual personality and just generally comes off as sincere in her convictions and often astute in her analyses. :meowdorable: Yes, she can be satisfyingly quippy, ha ha!  :popcorn:  I just don't agree with all of her convictions and this goes way beyond just like the understood trans activism and passive (even tacitly supportive!) attitude toward the commonality of prostitution in her district. I'm very much what they call a carceral feminist, for example, so not really big into the anti-police attitudes of the woke crowd that she quite frankly epitomizes. Being a female separatist, you likewise won't be surprised to learn that yes, I firmly believe in boundaries, including national borders. The fact that I don't believe in this state doesn't mean I'm an anarchist loon who thinks there should be none at all! Women need our own state, in my opinion, not the victory of organized crime or militias (which is what tends to fill in the gap with the cops go away). I live in one of those cities that tried one of those funding cuts for the police department experiments and to summarize the results, a number of the city councilors who backed that effort opted against running for re-election the next time. The question of "to AOC or not to AOC" next year hence for me turns on how important I deem a vaguely socialistic economic program to be next to serious social issues like these. But as things stand, if I vote in the '28 primary it will surely be for either her or Kamala Harris. That's sorta my mental range of options in consideration and it's about an even contest. I consider myself persuadable. Harris has no personality that's allowed to come out for more than 30 seconds at a time, that's her problem.

Yes, I tried with the Talarico / PC Principal comparison, hee!  :coy: I sure hope we haven't seen the last of Crockett in national politics. Either way though, I think she's pretty awesome.  :meowqueen:
Edited Apr 3 2026, 10:28 PM by Impress Polly.
Impress Polly
The kind they warned you about.
Apr 3 2026, 9:15 PM #4

(Mar 29 2026, 6:36 PM)Clover
Quote:I vote only for women nowadays. That's a matter of principle. My political goal is to live in a society, nay a world, without men, and I vote in the most logically matching way that I can. It's not that being a woman means I'll support you, it's just a bare minimum requirement that gives you the opportunity for my vote.

I sometimes do this. Especially in primaries and especially in races that I really have no preference. Just default to the woman cuz muahaha. The cases where I don't are when I read all the bios and think based on policy someone else is much more fitting. But if it's close, default to woman, lol.

My fav is Bernie Sanders cuz he got me into politics in 2016... :catcry: and I've been an active voter in almost every election since then. (I think I literally just missed one or two "special election" things for my country/distrcit/whatevs where it's like... literally just one boring levy and I honestly don't care which way it goes.) Elizabeth Warren is cool, in like, a "boring responsible" way I guess? lol. AOC iquite libfem but I do enjoy her quippiness.

Quote:She ran for the U.S. Senate this year, but was defeated in her party's primary by this man...

loooooool

Jasmine Crockett is cool. Even though she lost that primary, there's no way we have seen the last of her.

Well we have something in common here: my first vote was for Bernie too.  :harold: Back in 2002, I voted to re-elect him to represent my state's one Congressional district in the House of Representatives, then in 2006 I voted to elect him to the Senate in his first run for that post. He was sorta my fav' American politician back in the 2000s, mostly because he had the audacity to call himself a socialist and run outside the two-party system. I've missed many elections since 2008 though. I don't see how you sustain the motivation.

Over the years, I've noticed that feminist waves in a given country often seem to arise adjacent the ascendancy of women to (or even just toward sometimes) head-of-state positions, almost regardless of their politics. I've discussed the Korean feminist wave of the 2010s at some length here. It's no coincidence that that happened during the presidency of Park Geun-hye (who was a conservative). However indirectly, the two things were certainly related in much the same way that the most intensive period of our fourth feminist wave (e.g. Women's March, Me Too, Female Dating Strategy, etc.) and the unexpected defeat of Hillary Clinton were closely associated things, nor is it a coincidence that Thailand currently has one of the proportionally highest feminist-identifying population shares in the world shortly after they briefly got their second female prime minister. Etc. Women are rarely elected to such positions. They often have to just inherit them in some form or fashion (like how Kamala Harris inherited her party's nomination a couple years back) because the world hates and distrusts women. The ones who do win typically serve either just one term or aren't allowed to even serve out their term. Mass protests erupt, they get impeached, a military coup or an assassination happens...something that for male leaders would be extraordinary happens very ordinarily to women. The anger of either the public, the political establishment, or both gets directed with disproportionate force and ferocity at female leaders. Liberals respond with particular viscousness to conservative women who attain to power and vice versa. This predictably psychotic, over-the-top reaction is often noticed by women and begets a backlash that has less to do with politics than it does with a determination to challenge sexism. Thus I find that electing female leaders has intrinsic value of its own in the way of exposing how ridiculously threatened people feel by the entire idea of women leading society.

Concerning AOC being a libfem...I mean they're all libfems. Like that's the only kind of feminist you're allowed to be at that level of visibility in America. That much is understood. The differences amongst them are a matter of degrees. What we're evaluating here hence is in essence the degrees. But anyway, addressing that more directly, I definitely like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a person, mostly because it's like you say: while she's gotten more polished and professional over the years, she's got an actual personality and just generally comes off as sincere in her convictions and often astute in her analyses. :meowdorable: Yes, she can be satisfyingly quippy, ha ha!  :popcorn:  I just don't agree with all of her convictions and this goes way beyond just like the understood trans activism and passive (even tacitly supportive!) attitude toward the commonality of prostitution in her district. I'm very much what they call a carceral feminist, for example, so not really big into the anti-police attitudes of the woke crowd that she quite frankly epitomizes. Being a female separatist, you likewise won't be surprised to learn that yes, I firmly believe in boundaries, including national borders. The fact that I don't believe in this state doesn't mean I'm an anarchist loon who thinks there should be none at all! Women need our own state, in my opinion, not the victory of organized crime or militias (which is what tends to fill in the gap with the cops go away). I live in one of those cities that tried one of those funding cuts for the police department experiments and to summarize the results, a number of the city councilors who backed that effort opted against running for re-election the next time. The question of "to AOC or not to AOC" next year hence for me turns on how important I deem a vaguely socialistic economic program to be next to serious social issues like these. But as things stand, if I vote in the '28 primary it will surely be for either her or Kamala Harris. That's sorta my mental range of options in consideration and it's about an even contest. I consider myself persuadable. Harris has no personality that's allowed to come out for more than 30 seconds at a time, that's her problem.

Yes, I tried with the Talarico / PC Principal comparison, hee!  :coy: I sure hope we haven't seen the last of Crockett in national politics. Either way though, I think she's pretty awesome.  :meowqueen:

Impress Polly
The kind they warned you about.
216
Apr 3 2026, 9:48 PM
#5
(Mar 30 2026, 5:32 PM)Elsacat Seconding AOC and Crockett. I was never an AOC hater at all but I wasn't always a fan, either. I'm liking her more and more as time goes by. Jasmine Crockett, I liked from the start. Neither she nor AOC take bullshit lying down.  

I admire Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie's commitment to keeping the Epstein files high profile and demanding answers. 

I'm trying to figure out Marjorie Taylor-Greene. I don't trust her anti-MAGA pivot, but if it's legit, good for her for being willing to admit what crap it is and how it's damaging the country. I'm curious what has made her feel bold enough to speak out on that. It makes me think she has some strong but quiet backing somewhere. From who, or what, though? That's the part that concerns me.

Oh I give MTG the main credit for, y'know, what we've gotten of the Epstein files. She specifically was the one who led the crusade on the Republican side and that's the side that matters most in a GOP-controlled Congress. She won and her penalty was a primary threat that she knew she couldn't win, so poof, she's gone. Thomas Massie more often than not to me just comes off as a disciple of hers.

As to her motives, I've heard that she was planning to run for the U.S. Senate but Trump refused to endorse her and basically she didn't forgive him. I believe it too. I also believe that probably most of her "new" worldview is for real, except for the BS about now opposing political toxicity and seeking a calmer tone of bi-partisan cooperation in public decision-making. Her body language says she's lying when she makes those particular claims. I mean yes, I believe she really is an anti-Zionist, for example. That is a very real thing in a certain corner of the online right (occupied by characters ranging from Tucker Carlson to Nick Fuentes). I believe that she is against the current war with Iran, against subsidizing Argentina's farmers while raising taxes on our own, and that she does in fact take a hard line on the H-1B visa. That is all real and corresponds to stuff the Republican youth of today increasingly feels. Can't deny that I like the "new, matured" her better too. I have a certain amount of inherent respect for those who do their own thinking too, as you might've ascertained. One gets no credit for being a mindless partisan hack with me. That takes no guts at all. Show me that you have a brain!
Edited Apr 3 2026, 10:05 PM by Impress Polly.
Impress Polly
The kind they warned you about.
Apr 3 2026, 9:48 PM #5

(Mar 30 2026, 5:32 PM)Elsacat Seconding AOC and Crockett. I was never an AOC hater at all but I wasn't always a fan, either. I'm liking her more and more as time goes by. Jasmine Crockett, I liked from the start. Neither she nor AOC take bullshit lying down.  

I admire Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie's commitment to keeping the Epstein files high profile and demanding answers. 

I'm trying to figure out Marjorie Taylor-Greene. I don't trust her anti-MAGA pivot, but if it's legit, good for her for being willing to admit what crap it is and how it's damaging the country. I'm curious what has made her feel bold enough to speak out on that. It makes me think she has some strong but quiet backing somewhere. From who, or what, though? That's the part that concerns me.

Oh I give MTG the main credit for, y'know, what we've gotten of the Epstein files. She specifically was the one who led the crusade on the Republican side and that's the side that matters most in a GOP-controlled Congress. She won and her penalty was a primary threat that she knew she couldn't win, so poof, she's gone. Thomas Massie more often than not to me just comes off as a disciple of hers.

As to her motives, I've heard that she was planning to run for the U.S. Senate but Trump refused to endorse her and basically she didn't forgive him. I believe it too. I also believe that probably most of her "new" worldview is for real, except for the BS about now opposing political toxicity and seeking a calmer tone of bi-partisan cooperation in public decision-making. Her body language says she's lying when she makes those particular claims. I mean yes, I believe she really is an anti-Zionist, for example. That is a very real thing in a certain corner of the online right (occupied by characters ranging from Tucker Carlson to Nick Fuentes). I believe that she is against the current war with Iran, against subsidizing Argentina's farmers while raising taxes on our own, and that she does in fact take a hard line on the H-1B visa. That is all real and corresponds to stuff the Republican youth of today increasingly feels. Can't deny that I like the "new, matured" her better too. I have a certain amount of inherent respect for those who do their own thinking too, as you might've ascertained. One gets no credit for being a mindless partisan hack with me. That takes no guts at all. Show me that you have a brain!

Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)
Recently Browsing
 1 Guest(s)