Article 'Let's just study males and keep it simple': How excluding female animals from research held neuroscience back...(cont.)
Article 'Let's just study males and keep it simple': How excluding female animals from research held neuroscience back...(cont.)
Quote:Actions taken by the Trump administration have spurred changes at America's major science agencies — and if worst comes to worst, these shifts may jeopardize our understanding of how the brain works and how to treat neurological conditions, experts told Live Science.
For years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has upheld a policy that requires scientists who work with vertebrate animals to consider "sex as a biological variable." To earn grants, researchers must explain how their study designs account for sex, such that any differences between the sexes will be made apparent. Researchers must provide strong scientific justification to include only one sex in a study.
But recently, The Transmitter reported that the NIH seems to have archived this policy. The NIH has yet to issue an official statement on the matter, but the move followed executive orders issued by the Trump administration that called for overturning "gender ideology" and "radical" diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
In apparently archiving its "sex as a biological variable" policy, the NIH could be signaling a shift away from requiring both males and females in research. And such a shift could be particularly dire for basic neuroscience research.
'Let's just study males and keep it simple': How excluding female animals from research held neuroscience back, and could do so again (livescience.com, March 7, 2025)
Quote:Actions taken by the Trump administration have spurred changes at America's major science agencies — and if worst comes to worst, these shifts may jeopardize our understanding of how the brain works and how to treat neurological conditions, experts told Live Science.
For years, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has upheld a policy that requires scientists who work with vertebrate animals to consider "sex as a biological variable." To earn grants, researchers must explain how their study designs account for sex, such that any differences between the sexes will be made apparent. Researchers must provide strong scientific justification to include only one sex in a study.
But recently, The Transmitter reported that the NIH seems to have archived this policy. The NIH has yet to issue an official statement on the matter, but the move followed executive orders issued by the Trump administration that called for overturning "gender ideology" and "radical" diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
In apparently archiving its "sex as a biological variable" policy, the NIH could be signaling a shift away from requiring both males and females in research. And such a shift could be particularly dire for basic neuroscience research.
Ever since side effects of a birth control pill almost made me go blind I have been absolutely terrified about being treated for anything. I'm physically and mentally disabled though and have to take medications anyway. This makes me even more scared going forward.
Have you all read Invisible Women? It's been a while since I have, but I believe she touched on the failure to test medicines on women in one chapter. I hate seeing this, but it doesn't feel surprising, either
I started reading it and had to put it aside for a bit. I'll come back to it but it may take me a while to get through it. Not because it's a slog, but because it's so angry-making and sad-making. Like how do you ignore literally half the world's population when designing or creating things that are supposed to be for everybody?
No, 100%, I think I read it in chunks for the same reason. It's difficult seeing real proof of how little we matter to so many men and society at large.