<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[clovenhooves - Sex-Based Rights]]></title>
		<link>https://clovenhooves.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[clovenhooves - https://clovenhooves.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 13:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TIMs invading women's spaces]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1959</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 03:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=506">Greenonion45</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1959</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Anyone else had this experience? It's honestly really unpleasant when you go into a women's space and there are TIMs infighting and causing drama. <br />
<br />
There was a woman venting about how she didn't enjoy being a woman and how if she could she would be a man (obviously because of oppression and ironically that's literally indication that she is a woman, because if she was a man she wouldn't be upset about those types of things) and the TIM was saying how their invading women's spaces (the irony) and that their a transmale (irony of telling someone what they should identify as based on thoughts and personality) and they made 2 whole posts about this and seemed so enraged and started a smear campaign when I stood up for this woman. <br />
<br />
I guess because to these people their fragile identity that has no basis in reality or biology can't stand it when someone who's actually biologically female has complaints about being a woman, because they romanticise and fetishize being a woman so much it becomes far removed from reality. <br />
<br />
These people see woman as an aesthetic, personality trait and fetish instead of as a biology and so they hate when someone who is a woman doesn't behave how they think they should. Imagine trying to kick a biological woman out of female spaces by shunning them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anyone else had this experience? It's honestly really unpleasant when you go into a women's space and there are TIMs infighting and causing drama. <br />
<br />
There was a woman venting about how she didn't enjoy being a woman and how if she could she would be a man (obviously because of oppression and ironically that's literally indication that she is a woman, because if she was a man she wouldn't be upset about those types of things) and the TIM was saying how their invading women's spaces (the irony) and that their a transmale (irony of telling someone what they should identify as based on thoughts and personality) and they made 2 whole posts about this and seemed so enraged and started a smear campaign when I stood up for this woman. <br />
<br />
I guess because to these people their fragile identity that has no basis in reality or biology can't stand it when someone who's actually biologically female has complaints about being a woman, because they romanticise and fetishize being a woman so much it becomes far removed from reality. <br />
<br />
These people see woman as an aesthetic, personality trait and fetish instead of as a biology and so they hate when someone who is a woman doesn't behave how they think they should. Imagine trying to kick a biological woman out of female spaces by shunning them.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Petition following brutal violence by Groningen woman (47) born as a man in women's prison.]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1945</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=540">Mixmax</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1945</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://archive.ph/7I8Ot" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Petitie na grof geweld door als man geboren Groningse (47) in vrouwengevangenis. ‘Transvrouwen zijn gevaar voor vrouwelijke medegedetineerden’ - Dagblad van het Noorden</a><br />
 <br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Petition following brutal violence by Groningen woman (47) born as a man in women's prison. 'Trans women are a danger to female fellow inmates'<br />
</span><br />
Transgender people born as men do not belong in women's prisons. This is the opinion of the Voorzij Foundation, which is submitting a petition to that effect in The Hague on Tuesday. The immediate cause: a transgender inmate from Groningen (47) beat up a female guard in a women's prison last year. The guard was no match for the physically stronger inmate.<br />
"A man is a man and can never become a woman." Chairwoman Caroline Franssen (64) of the Voorzij Foundation has a strong opinion about transgender people. "A man without a penis is not a woman. Not biologically, not physically. Trans women incarcerated often still have their penises. But even without one, they pose a danger to female fellow inmates."<br />
The transgender person mentioned from Groningen stabbed a man to death at his home on Verlengde Frederikstraat in the city in April 2024 and was in pre-trial detention in the Ter Peel women's prison in Limburg. There, a visit to the recreation area was refused, after which the person set fire to the cell. The female guard who wanted to intervene was attacked out of nowhere and was rescued with difficulty by colleagues. She was seriously injured with two fractures in an eye socket, possible permanent eye damage, and other injuries.<br />
<br />
The stabbing took place on April 23, 2024, on Verlengde Frederikstraat in Groningen. Photo: Archive/ Noordernieuws<br />
The serious incident—brutal violence is rare in a women's prison—fuels Franssen in her fight. "As a woman, you are naturally no match for a biological man who presents himself as a woman. Not in sports, not in the locker room, not in prison."<br />
<br />
Lawyer: ‘difficult matter’<br />
The transgender woman from Groningen was sentenced to 9 years in prison and compulsory psychiatric treatment for stabbing the man to death and assaulting the guard, and is now incarcerated in the Zwolle Penitentiary Institution, which has both men's and women's sections. Lawyer Maikel Horsch is representing the trans woman. “She has been placed in a mixed ward of the psychiatric center. But she would prefer to go to a women's wing.”<br />
<br />
The lawyer speaks of ‘difficult matter’. “My client feels like a woman; she was also addressed as ‘Ms.’ in the courtroom. But she has the characteristics of a man; she is biologically a man as well.”<br />
<br />
That is why the lawyer understands the call to no longer house trans women among female detainees. “In detention, we see special wards for terrorists, for example, because you like to isolate them. That also applies to sex offenders, because they are quite often at risk among fellow prisoners. Why not a separate ward for transgender people as well? That would tackle the problem.”<br />
<br />
Activists from the Voorzij Foundation with banners at the courthouse in Dordrecht. Iratxe Alvarez Hernandez<br />
Pornography with trans woman in Veendam<br />
Another recent case involving a trans woman is currently being handled in the Northern Netherlands. In March 2025, the court sentenced a 40-year-old trans woman from Veendam to 3.5 years in prison and conditional TBS (no involuntary commitment) for possessing and distributing ‘the most disgusting child and animal pornography’. This detainee’s lawyer is not responding to callback requests from this newspaper.<br />
<br />
Women are a distinct minority in the Dutch prison system. Only 6 percent of all people in detention in 2024 were women, according to figures from Statistics Netherlands (CBS). On average, they also serve only a short time: 80 percent are incarcerated for a maximum of 3 months, and 60 percent for less than a month. Franssen: “So you are falsifying history and tampering with statistics if you record male criminals as women. It simply doesn’t add up.”<br />
<br />
But the biggest problem is the lack of safety for women within the walls with men in their midst. “We are dealing with vulnerable women, who often have experiences with exploitation and sexual violence. That makes them extra vulnerable,” says Franssen. “Moreover, incarcerated trans women often have a mental disorder.” The former journalist and lawyer works as an independent coach and primarily trains therapists. She has been fighting for women’s rights her ‘entire life’.<br />
<br />
‘No dick in the women’s lick’<br />
Together with supporters in the Voorzij Foundation, Franssen protested against trans women in women’s prisons in 2023. With slogans such as ‘No dick in the women’s lick’, they expressed their displeasure at the fact that a sex worker born as a man was locked up in women’s prison De Peel. The transgender woman had killed a client with 214 stab wounds and was sentenced to 14 years in prison for it. And there are more examples like this.<br />
<br />
Franssen denounces the privileges of transgender people in the Netherlands. “Society must go along with someone who thinks he was born in the wrong body. Otherwise, you do not respect him as a human being. Cross-dressing, homosexuality, it is all fine. But biologically speaking, you cannot change a gender,” says Franssen. Tomorrow she will submit the petition, which has been signed over 2,300 times, to the Standing Committee on Justice and Security of the House of Representatives.<br />
<br />
Trans woman</blockquote>
<br />
The archive link is a Dutch article, which is translated here above. It makes me angry that this can happen and that it's seen as progressive to allow this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://archive.ph/7I8Ot" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Petitie na grof geweld door als man geboren Groningse (47) in vrouwengevangenis. ‘Transvrouwen zijn gevaar voor vrouwelijke medegedetineerden’ - Dagblad van het Noorden</a><br />
 <br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Petition following brutal violence by Groningen woman (47) born as a man in women's prison. 'Trans women are a danger to female fellow inmates'<br />
</span><br />
Transgender people born as men do not belong in women's prisons. This is the opinion of the Voorzij Foundation, which is submitting a petition to that effect in The Hague on Tuesday. The immediate cause: a transgender inmate from Groningen (47) beat up a female guard in a women's prison last year. The guard was no match for the physically stronger inmate.<br />
"A man is a man and can never become a woman." Chairwoman Caroline Franssen (64) of the Voorzij Foundation has a strong opinion about transgender people. "A man without a penis is not a woman. Not biologically, not physically. Trans women incarcerated often still have their penises. But even without one, they pose a danger to female fellow inmates."<br />
The transgender person mentioned from Groningen stabbed a man to death at his home on Verlengde Frederikstraat in the city in April 2024 and was in pre-trial detention in the Ter Peel women's prison in Limburg. There, a visit to the recreation area was refused, after which the person set fire to the cell. The female guard who wanted to intervene was attacked out of nowhere and was rescued with difficulty by colleagues. She was seriously injured with two fractures in an eye socket, possible permanent eye damage, and other injuries.<br />
<br />
The stabbing took place on April 23, 2024, on Verlengde Frederikstraat in Groningen. Photo: Archive/ Noordernieuws<br />
The serious incident—brutal violence is rare in a women's prison—fuels Franssen in her fight. "As a woman, you are naturally no match for a biological man who presents himself as a woman. Not in sports, not in the locker room, not in prison."<br />
<br />
Lawyer: ‘difficult matter’<br />
The transgender woman from Groningen was sentenced to 9 years in prison and compulsory psychiatric treatment for stabbing the man to death and assaulting the guard, and is now incarcerated in the Zwolle Penitentiary Institution, which has both men's and women's sections. Lawyer Maikel Horsch is representing the trans woman. “She has been placed in a mixed ward of the psychiatric center. But she would prefer to go to a women's wing.”<br />
<br />
The lawyer speaks of ‘difficult matter’. “My client feels like a woman; she was also addressed as ‘Ms.’ in the courtroom. But she has the characteristics of a man; she is biologically a man as well.”<br />
<br />
That is why the lawyer understands the call to no longer house trans women among female detainees. “In detention, we see special wards for terrorists, for example, because you like to isolate them. That also applies to sex offenders, because they are quite often at risk among fellow prisoners. Why not a separate ward for transgender people as well? That would tackle the problem.”<br />
<br />
Activists from the Voorzij Foundation with banners at the courthouse in Dordrecht. Iratxe Alvarez Hernandez<br />
Pornography with trans woman in Veendam<br />
Another recent case involving a trans woman is currently being handled in the Northern Netherlands. In March 2025, the court sentenced a 40-year-old trans woman from Veendam to 3.5 years in prison and conditional TBS (no involuntary commitment) for possessing and distributing ‘the most disgusting child and animal pornography’. This detainee’s lawyer is not responding to callback requests from this newspaper.<br />
<br />
Women are a distinct minority in the Dutch prison system. Only 6 percent of all people in detention in 2024 were women, according to figures from Statistics Netherlands (CBS). On average, they also serve only a short time: 80 percent are incarcerated for a maximum of 3 months, and 60 percent for less than a month. Franssen: “So you are falsifying history and tampering with statistics if you record male criminals as women. It simply doesn’t add up.”<br />
<br />
But the biggest problem is the lack of safety for women within the walls with men in their midst. “We are dealing with vulnerable women, who often have experiences with exploitation and sexual violence. That makes them extra vulnerable,” says Franssen. “Moreover, incarcerated trans women often have a mental disorder.” The former journalist and lawyer works as an independent coach and primarily trains therapists. She has been fighting for women’s rights her ‘entire life’.<br />
<br />
‘No dick in the women’s lick’<br />
Together with supporters in the Voorzij Foundation, Franssen protested against trans women in women’s prisons in 2023. With slogans such as ‘No dick in the women’s lick’, they expressed their displeasure at the fact that a sex worker born as a man was locked up in women’s prison De Peel. The transgender woman had killed a client with 214 stab wounds and was sentenced to 14 years in prison for it. And there are more examples like this.<br />
<br />
Franssen denounces the privileges of transgender people in the Netherlands. “Society must go along with someone who thinks he was born in the wrong body. Otherwise, you do not respect him as a human being. Cross-dressing, homosexuality, it is all fine. But biologically speaking, you cannot change a gender,” says Franssen. Tomorrow she will submit the petition, which has been signed over 2,300 times, to the Standing Committee on Justice and Security of the House of Representatives.<br />
<br />
Trans woman</blockquote>
<br />
The archive link is a Dutch article, which is translated here above. It makes me angry that this can happen and that it's seen as progressive to allow this.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Quebec to jail inmates according to anatomical sex, not gender identity]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1282</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 21:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">Clover</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1282</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[CTV News, June 18 2025<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/transgender-prisoners-will-be-detained-according-to-their-sex-at-birth-in-quebec/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/transgender-prisoners-will-be-detained-according-to-their-sex-at-birth-in-quebec/</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Quebec’s public security minister says transgender inmates will be incarcerated according to their anatomical sex, not their gender identity.<br />
<br />
François Bonnardel says in a statement the measure is to ensure the safety of all inmates.<br />
<br />
He says inmates’ bodies will be scanned to determine which detention centre they will be directed to, adding that some accommodations will be possible.<br />
<br />
Inside jails, transgender inmates will be allowed to identify with the gender of their choice.</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[CTV News, June 18 2025<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/transgender-prisoners-will-be-detained-according-to-their-sex-at-birth-in-quebec/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/transgender-prisoners-will-be-detained-according-to-their-sex-at-birth-in-quebec/</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Quebec’s public security minister says transgender inmates will be incarcerated according to their anatomical sex, not their gender identity.<br />
<br />
François Bonnardel says in a statement the measure is to ensure the safety of all inmates.<br />
<br />
He says inmates’ bodies will be scanned to determine which detention centre they will be directed to, adding that some accommodations will be possible.<br />
<br />
Inside jails, transgender inmates will be allowed to identify with the gender of their choice.</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why is there such a generational divide in views on sex and gender in Britain? ( Susanna Rustin)]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1251</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=154">wormwood</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1251</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Entirely predictably, this typically thoughtful piece has been greeted with howls of “She is saying you’re more of a woman if you bear a child!” “Did this TERF never talk to other women?” and other such wilful misreadings.<br />
<br />
It’s pretty clear she’s saying that some of the ways in which the female sex is oppressed are most deeply felt when they are physically gone through, and that women and girls need sex-based protection because our sex makes us vulnerable in different ways from males.<br />
<br />
Lived experience is politically significant. Unless you’re a TERF, in which case, shut up, witch.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/05/generational-divide-views-sex-gender-britain" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/05/generational-divide-views-sex-gender-britain</a> <br />
<br />
Text: <br />
Differing attitudes to women’s and transgender rights activism are often said to be generational. One poll, published a month on from the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/16/critics-of-trans-rights-win-uk-supreme-court-case-over-definition-of-woman" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">supreme court ruling</a> that the legal definition of “woman” in the Equality Act is based on biological sex, found <a href="https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/poll-shows-public-support-for-the-supreme-court-decision/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">63% supportive</a>of the ruling and 18% opposed. But younger people were far more likely to be in the latter camp, with 53% of 18- to 24-year-olds disagreeing with the judgment. In my age group, 50-64, the figure was just 13%. Such results echo <a href="https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51545-where-does-the-british-public-stand-on-transgender-rights-in-202425" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">earlier polls</a>.<br />
As with any attempt to link a demographic with a point of view, there are plenty of exceptions. Last month <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/may/22/court-ruling-legal-definition-of-a-woman-misinterpreted-lady-hale" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Lady Hale</a>, the octogenarian former president of the supreme court, became one of them when she argued that the ruling had been misinterpreted, telling a literary festival she had met doctors “who said there is no such thing as biological sex”.<br />
The progressive explanation for the age gap is in the name: progress. As the arc of history bends towards justice, younger people are ahead of the curve. Social scientists call this a cohort effect, which basically means that when you are born is one of the influences (along with income, education and so on) on your politics. In relation to transgender rights, the reasoning is that people born since the 1980s are more relaxed about sex and sexuality, and more committed to personal freedoms including the right to define one’s own identity. The obvious catch to this analysis, at the moment, is the way some young men have swung <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/mar/08/nigel-farage-feels-real-why-young-british-men-are-drawn-to-reform" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">towards the hard right</a>.<br />
If a cohort effect applies when it comes to gender, and assuming that future cohorts are in agreement, gender identity advocates can look forward to winning this argument eventually. Older, conservative voters (and politicians and judges and journalists such as me), who don’t think someone’s trans identity should take precedence over their biological sex when society decides which sports teams or prisons they belong in, are just causing a delay. This was the view endorsed by David Lammy in 2021 when he said there were <a href="https://labourlist.org/2021/09/anti-trans-members-are-dinosaurs-who-want-to-hoard-rights-says-lammy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">“dinosaurs […] in our own party”</a> who want to “hoard rights”. The extinction of such people would, he implied, sort things out in the end.<br />
Along with other middle-aged, gender-critical women, I have got used to dismissals such as Lammy’s. One of us, Victoria Smith, wrote a book about such attitudes and called it <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/27/hags-by-victoria-smith-review-welcome-to-the-age-of-rage" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Hags</a>. But terminology aside, I think those who characterise this struggle as being between young progressives and ageing reactionaries are mistaken. While I fully support transgender people’s right to be protected from discrimination, I don’t regard the erosion of sex-based entitlements – including single-sex sports and spaces – in favour of an ethos of “inclusion” as either liberal or leftwing.<br />
On the contrary, I think valuing inclusion over bodily privacy (<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/09/no-woman-should-be-forced-to-change-her-clothes-in-front-of-a-trans-colleague" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">in changing rooms</a>) or fairness (<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jun/20/no-magic-solution-in-the-battle-over-trans-inclusion-in-womens-sport" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">in sports</a>) is sexist – since women are more disadvantaged by these changes than men. And while gender identity campaigners claim autonomy and choice as progressive, even socialist, values, I see their emphasis on the individual’s right to self-definition as congruent with consumer capitalism. Multinational corporations, including banks and retailers, embrace <a href="https://www.stonewall.org.uk/inclusive-workplaces/top-100-employers/top-100-employers-full-list" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index</a> and fly Progress Pride flags from their buildings because the shift away from the class politics of redistribution towards the identity politics of personal expression suits them.<br />
In 2023 the 40th British Social Attitudes survey described the widening age gap in UK politics as “a puzzle”, with changing party loyalties only partly mirrored in answers to questions seeking to place people on a left-right spectrum or a liberal-authoritarian one. To anyone looking for answers to the question of why such age differences exist – in relation to the supreme court or other issues – I would suggest that as well as cohorts (gen X versus Z and so on), they should consider the life cycle. Clearly, some things matter more to people as they get older, pensions being an obvious example. What if biological sex is another?<br />
This rings true with aspects of my own experience. For example, it wasn’t until I had children that I learned about birth injuries, came face to face with pregnancy and maternity discrimination, or understood that the gender pay gap is also a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/08/uk-mothers-earned-444-less-an-hour-than-fathers-in-2023-finds-analysis" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">motherhood penalty</a>. It’s not that I hadn’t been aware of my female body before this. But one of the things about having babies is the way that the biological and social become so enmeshed. More recently, I’ve become fascinated by female evolutionary thinkers such as <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2000/aug/03/londonreviewofbooks" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Sarah Hrdy</a>, whose life’s work has been to explore this tangle.<br />
Now, at 53, there is menopause and ageing. Most weeks my yoga teacher has something to say about the importance for women of strength-building exercises to ward off osteoporosis; of keeping our femur bones firmly in our hip sockets and using muscles to hold our reproductive organs in place.<br />
That male and female bodies go wrong in different ways is nothing new: the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/feb/24/breast-cancer-diagnoses-deaths-surge-worldwide-who" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">most common cancer for women</a> worldwide is breast cancer, while in England <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jan/28/prostate-cancer-becomes-most-common-cancer-diagnosis-in-england" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">prostate cancer</a> is the most frequently diagnosed in men. What has only recently become better known, thanks to advances in medical research and campaigners such as <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/09/male-bias-medical-trials-women-lives-data-gap" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Caroline Criado Perez</a>, is that even when we get the same diseases <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/07/the-guardian-view-on-bias-in-medical-research-disregard-for-womens-health-belongs-in-the-past" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">there are differences</a>, with examples including heart disease, Parkinson’s and dementia.<br />
As with reproduction, later-life physiological divergences have social and economic consequences. Social care is a feminist issue due to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/may/01/women-live-more-years-ill-health-than-men-gender-health-gap-study" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">women’s greater longevity</a>, as well as the sector’s <a href="https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9615/CBP-9615.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">predominantly female workforce</a>. Most of the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/15/pensions-britain-women-equality-state-private" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">poorest pensioners are single women</a> as many wives outlive their husbands, but also because of lower average lifetime earnings linked to women taking breaks from employment to care for children.<br />
And what about men? Like women, the older they are, the less likely they are to tell pollsters that gender identity should replace biological sex as a legal and social category. This makes sense to me, since my argument is that consciousness of sexual difference accumulates across the life-course. The fact that men are far less likely to be actively involved in campaigning on this issue than gender-critical women – even when they agree with us – is also easy to understand. Now, as in the past, men need legal protection against sex-based discrimination, abuse or injustice much less often than women.<br />
I don’t presume to predict that today’s gender identity activists will one day change their minds. But it has never seemed clearer to me than it does now that women and men have some different needs and experiences that the law must recognise. Far from an old fogey’s statute, I think the 15-year-old Equality Act, with its staunch protection of sex-based rights, is full of life.<br />
<br /><ul class="mycode_list"><li>Susanna Rustin is a social affairs journalist and the author of Sexed: A History of British Feminism<br />
</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Entirely predictably, this typically thoughtful piece has been greeted with howls of “She is saying you’re more of a woman if you bear a child!” “Did this TERF never talk to other women?” and other such wilful misreadings.<br />
<br />
It’s pretty clear she’s saying that some of the ways in which the female sex is oppressed are most deeply felt when they are physically gone through, and that women and girls need sex-based protection because our sex makes us vulnerable in different ways from males.<br />
<br />
Lived experience is politically significant. Unless you’re a TERF, in which case, shut up, witch.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/05/generational-divide-views-sex-gender-britain" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/05/generational-divide-views-sex-gender-britain</a> <br />
<br />
Text: <br />
Differing attitudes to women’s and transgender rights activism are often said to be generational. One poll, published a month on from the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/16/critics-of-trans-rights-win-uk-supreme-court-case-over-definition-of-woman" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">supreme court ruling</a> that the legal definition of “woman” in the Equality Act is based on biological sex, found <a href="https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/poll-shows-public-support-for-the-supreme-court-decision/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">63% supportive</a>of the ruling and 18% opposed. But younger people were far more likely to be in the latter camp, with 53% of 18- to 24-year-olds disagreeing with the judgment. In my age group, 50-64, the figure was just 13%. Such results echo <a href="https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51545-where-does-the-british-public-stand-on-transgender-rights-in-202425" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">earlier polls</a>.<br />
As with any attempt to link a demographic with a point of view, there are plenty of exceptions. Last month <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/may/22/court-ruling-legal-definition-of-a-woman-misinterpreted-lady-hale" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Lady Hale</a>, the octogenarian former president of the supreme court, became one of them when she argued that the ruling had been misinterpreted, telling a literary festival she had met doctors “who said there is no such thing as biological sex”.<br />
The progressive explanation for the age gap is in the name: progress. As the arc of history bends towards justice, younger people are ahead of the curve. Social scientists call this a cohort effect, which basically means that when you are born is one of the influences (along with income, education and so on) on your politics. In relation to transgender rights, the reasoning is that people born since the 1980s are more relaxed about sex and sexuality, and more committed to personal freedoms including the right to define one’s own identity. The obvious catch to this analysis, at the moment, is the way some young men have swung <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/mar/08/nigel-farage-feels-real-why-young-british-men-are-drawn-to-reform" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">towards the hard right</a>.<br />
If a cohort effect applies when it comes to gender, and assuming that future cohorts are in agreement, gender identity advocates can look forward to winning this argument eventually. Older, conservative voters (and politicians and judges and journalists such as me), who don’t think someone’s trans identity should take precedence over their biological sex when society decides which sports teams or prisons they belong in, are just causing a delay. This was the view endorsed by David Lammy in 2021 when he said there were <a href="https://labourlist.org/2021/09/anti-trans-members-are-dinosaurs-who-want-to-hoard-rights-says-lammy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">“dinosaurs […] in our own party”</a> who want to “hoard rights”. The extinction of such people would, he implied, sort things out in the end.<br />
Along with other middle-aged, gender-critical women, I have got used to dismissals such as Lammy’s. One of us, Victoria Smith, wrote a book about such attitudes and called it <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/feb/27/hags-by-victoria-smith-review-welcome-to-the-age-of-rage" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Hags</a>. But terminology aside, I think those who characterise this struggle as being between young progressives and ageing reactionaries are mistaken. While I fully support transgender people’s right to be protected from discrimination, I don’t regard the erosion of sex-based entitlements – including single-sex sports and spaces – in favour of an ethos of “inclusion” as either liberal or leftwing.<br />
On the contrary, I think valuing inclusion over bodily privacy (<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/09/no-woman-should-be-forced-to-change-her-clothes-in-front-of-a-trans-colleague" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">in changing rooms</a>) or fairness (<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jun/20/no-magic-solution-in-the-battle-over-trans-inclusion-in-womens-sport" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">in sports</a>) is sexist – since women are more disadvantaged by these changes than men. And while gender identity campaigners claim autonomy and choice as progressive, even socialist, values, I see their emphasis on the individual’s right to self-definition as congruent with consumer capitalism. Multinational corporations, including banks and retailers, embrace <a href="https://www.stonewall.org.uk/inclusive-workplaces/top-100-employers/top-100-employers-full-list" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Stonewall’s Workplace Equality Index</a> and fly Progress Pride flags from their buildings because the shift away from the class politics of redistribution towards the identity politics of personal expression suits them.<br />
In 2023 the 40th British Social Attitudes survey described the widening age gap in UK politics as “a puzzle”, with changing party loyalties only partly mirrored in answers to questions seeking to place people on a left-right spectrum or a liberal-authoritarian one. To anyone looking for answers to the question of why such age differences exist – in relation to the supreme court or other issues – I would suggest that as well as cohorts (gen X versus Z and so on), they should consider the life cycle. Clearly, some things matter more to people as they get older, pensions being an obvious example. What if biological sex is another?<br />
This rings true with aspects of my own experience. For example, it wasn’t until I had children that I learned about birth injuries, came face to face with pregnancy and maternity discrimination, or understood that the gender pay gap is also a <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/08/uk-mothers-earned-444-less-an-hour-than-fathers-in-2023-finds-analysis" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">motherhood penalty</a>. It’s not that I hadn’t been aware of my female body before this. But one of the things about having babies is the way that the biological and social become so enmeshed. More recently, I’ve become fascinated by female evolutionary thinkers such as <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2000/aug/03/londonreviewofbooks" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Sarah Hrdy</a>, whose life’s work has been to explore this tangle.<br />
Now, at 53, there is menopause and ageing. Most weeks my yoga teacher has something to say about the importance for women of strength-building exercises to ward off osteoporosis; of keeping our femur bones firmly in our hip sockets and using muscles to hold our reproductive organs in place.<br />
That male and female bodies go wrong in different ways is nothing new: the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/feb/24/breast-cancer-diagnoses-deaths-surge-worldwide-who" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">most common cancer for women</a> worldwide is breast cancer, while in England <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jan/28/prostate-cancer-becomes-most-common-cancer-diagnosis-in-england" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">prostate cancer</a> is the most frequently diagnosed in men. What has only recently become better known, thanks to advances in medical research and campaigners such as <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/09/male-bias-medical-trials-women-lives-data-gap" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Caroline Criado Perez</a>, is that even when we get the same diseases <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/07/the-guardian-view-on-bias-in-medical-research-disregard-for-womens-health-belongs-in-the-past" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">there are differences</a>, with examples including heart disease, Parkinson’s and dementia.<br />
As with reproduction, later-life physiological divergences have social and economic consequences. Social care is a feminist issue due to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/may/01/women-live-more-years-ill-health-than-men-gender-health-gap-study" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">women’s greater longevity</a>, as well as the sector’s <a href="https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9615/CBP-9615.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">predominantly female workforce</a>. Most of the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/15/pensions-britain-women-equality-state-private" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">poorest pensioners are single women</a> as many wives outlive their husbands, but also because of lower average lifetime earnings linked to women taking breaks from employment to care for children.<br />
And what about men? Like women, the older they are, the less likely they are to tell pollsters that gender identity should replace biological sex as a legal and social category. This makes sense to me, since my argument is that consciousness of sexual difference accumulates across the life-course. The fact that men are far less likely to be actively involved in campaigning on this issue than gender-critical women – even when they agree with us – is also easy to understand. Now, as in the past, men need legal protection against sex-based discrimination, abuse or injustice much less often than women.<br />
I don’t presume to predict that today’s gender identity activists will one day change their minds. But it has never seemed clearer to me than it does now that women and men have some different needs and experiences that the law must recognise. Far from an old fogey’s statute, I think the 15-year-old Equality Act, with its staunch protection of sex-based rights, is full of life.<br />
<br /><ul class="mycode_list"><li>Susanna Rustin is a social affairs journalist and the author of Sexed: A History of British Feminism<br />
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Let’s not downplay this triumph for women — op ed by Janice Turner]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1026</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 18:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=300">Myrth</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1026</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed reading this op ed today. Now, if only we can have similar success in the USA.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/lets-not-downplay-this-triumph-for-women-kjblm09zb" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/lets-not-downplay-this-triumph-for-women-kjblm09zb</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I enjoyed reading this op ed today. Now, if only we can have similar success in the USA.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/lets-not-downplay-this-triumph-for-women-kjblm09zb" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/lets-not-downplay-this-triumph-for-women-kjblm09zb</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The march of the trans mob is over - Julie Burchill]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1023</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=144">Colibri</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1023</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[April 19, 2025<a href="https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-march-of-the-trans-mob-is-over/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url"><br />
<br />
The march of the trans mob is over</a><br />
<a href="https://archive.ph/7nAXq" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://archive.ph/7nAXq</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>If these men really were women – and political ones at that, as they like to pretend – they’d put their defeat to one side, suck it up and simply get stuck in to fighting for women’s issues to demonstrate their determination to keep faith with the second sex. There’s certainly a fair amount to protest about. The pandemic of sexual violence. The over-representation of females who have committed non-violent crime in prisons. The restriction of abortion everywhere from Trump’s USA to Communist Nicaragua. But they won’t be getting involved in any of these issues, as none of the goals would involve pushing women out of their own spaces and then trampling all over them with their man-size feet. Instead, they’ll sulk, shout and stomp around, ceaselessly thirsty for media attention.</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[April 19, 2025<a href="https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-march-of-the-trans-mob-is-over/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url"><br />
<br />
The march of the trans mob is over</a><br />
<a href="https://archive.ph/7nAXq" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://archive.ph/7nAXq</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>If these men really were women – and political ones at that, as they like to pretend – they’d put their defeat to one side, suck it up and simply get stuck in to fighting for women’s issues to demonstrate their determination to keep faith with the second sex. There’s certainly a fair amount to protest about. The pandemic of sexual violence. The over-representation of females who have committed non-violent crime in prisons. The restriction of abortion everywhere from Trump’s USA to Communist Nicaragua. But they won’t be getting involved in any of these issues, as none of the goals would involve pushing women out of their own spaces and then trampling all over them with their man-size feet. Instead, they’ll sulk, shout and stomp around, ceaselessly thirsty for media attention.</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reactions to UK Supreme Court Decision Defining Woman]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1019</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=172">eyeswideopen</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1019</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Just posting a thread here to link to some of my favorite reactions to the April 16, 2025 UK Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland (FWS) v The Scottish Ministers re the definition of woman in the Equality Act 2010<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/press-summary/uksc-2024-0042" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/press-summary/uksc-2024-0042</a><br />
<br />
Mostly I'm posting because I'm enjoying the joy and well-earned satisfaction of the women from and supporting FWS's position on this issue and their happiness is giving me life right now. But also because I'm finding the analyses and discussion from the legal and other experts being interviewed quite informative, particularly re what we can expect to see in the future. I'll be adding to my post as I come across new podcasts/articles. Would love to see your favorites as well, so please post links when you have them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just posting a thread here to link to some of my favorite reactions to the April 16, 2025 UK Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland (FWS) v The Scottish Ministers re the definition of woman in the Equality Act 2010<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/press-summary/uksc-2024-0042" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/press-summary/uksc-2024-0042</a><br />
<br />
Mostly I'm posting because I'm enjoying the joy and well-earned satisfaction of the women from and supporting FWS's position on this issue and their happiness is giving me life right now. But also because I'm finding the analyses and discussion from the legal and other experts being interviewed quite informative, particularly re what we can expect to see in the future. I'll be adding to my post as I come across new podcasts/articles. Would love to see your favorites as well, so please post links when you have them.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rant - oh the virtue signaling among the gender entitled in the U.K.]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1015</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=154">wormwood</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1015</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The British Supreme Court’s clarification of what “woman” means in the Equality Act is level-headed, precise, and necessary. The excellent Susanna Rustin lays it out here, in an opinion piece tucked away far from the main opinion page in <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/17/clarity-uk-supreme-court-rights-of-women-campaigners" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Guardian </a>. She describes, too, the febrile political atmosphere in which the judgement lands:<br />
<br />
“ Despite their borrowings from intellectual postmodernism, gender identity activists (including such luminaries as <a href="https://culturewarblues.substack.com/p/judith-butler-speech-censorship-and" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Judith Butler</a>) take a binary view of our complicated world in which anyone who doesn’t line up with them must be on Team Trump.“<br />
<br />
And oh goddesses but the British oh-so-progressives are busily demonstrating it on Bluesky! It’s the usual disingenuous nonsense, women declaring that they will be forced to carry birth certificates or take dna tests to enter the loos, others declaring they will never watch anything by the actors who signed up for the new Harry Potter series again, still others declaring middle-aged Scottish feminists to be the real fascists. <br />
<br />
It’s all so very tedious, and in the decade plus I’ve been talking, thinking, and arguing about the obvious, obvious truth that sex is binary, immutable, and politically significant I’ve seen it all before, over and over. I don’t know why it’s irritating me so very much this time. Usually I just go, “ah, the performatively virtuous are out again, reaping their social media praise”, and ignore it. But today it made me so angry I had to say something somewhere. I don’t want to post any of it. I’m not interested in why this or that person is being deliberately obtuse, or any further deep dives into social media narcissism. I just needed to let off some steam.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The British Supreme Court’s clarification of what “woman” means in the Equality Act is level-headed, precise, and necessary. The excellent Susanna Rustin lays it out here, in an opinion piece tucked away far from the main opinion page in <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/17/clarity-uk-supreme-court-rights-of-women-campaigners" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Guardian </a>. She describes, too, the febrile political atmosphere in which the judgement lands:<br />
<br />
“ Despite their borrowings from intellectual postmodernism, gender identity activists (including such luminaries as <a href="https://culturewarblues.substack.com/p/judith-butler-speech-censorship-and" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Judith Butler</a>) take a binary view of our complicated world in which anyone who doesn’t line up with them must be on Team Trump.“<br />
<br />
And oh goddesses but the British oh-so-progressives are busily demonstrating it on Bluesky! It’s the usual disingenuous nonsense, women declaring that they will be forced to carry birth certificates or take dna tests to enter the loos, others declaring they will never watch anything by the actors who signed up for the new Harry Potter series again, still others declaring middle-aged Scottish feminists to be the real fascists. <br />
<br />
It’s all so very tedious, and in the decade plus I’ve been talking, thinking, and arguing about the obvious, obvious truth that sex is binary, immutable, and politically significant I’ve seen it all before, over and over. I don’t know why it’s irritating me so very much this time. Usually I just go, “ah, the performatively virtuous are out again, reaping their social media praise”, and ignore it. But today it made me so angry I had to say something somewhere. I don’t want to post any of it. I’m not interested in why this or that person is being deliberately obtuse, or any further deep dives into social media narcissism. I just needed to let off some steam.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[UK Supreme Court rules that definition of woman in Equality Act refers to 'biological women']]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1002</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=172">eyeswideopen</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=1002</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Congratulations to our sisters in the UK and everyone who fought so hard for this victory today. My heart is so full for all of you.<br />
<br />
Link to Sex Matters analysis: <br />
<br />
<a href="https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/its-a-win/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/its-a-win/</a> <br />
<br />
Link to reactions by groups across the U.K.:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/live/2025/apr/16/uk-supreme-court-to-rule-on-legal-definition-of-a-woman-gender-recognition-certificates" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.theguardian.com/law/live/2025/apr/16/uk-supreme-court-to-rule-on-legal-definition-of-a-woman-gender-recognition-certificates</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Congratulations to our sisters in the UK and everyone who fought so hard for this victory today. My heart is so full for all of you.<br />
<br />
Link to Sex Matters analysis: <br />
<br />
<a href="https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/its-a-win/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/its-a-win/</a> <br />
<br />
Link to reactions by groups across the U.K.:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/law/live/2025/apr/16/uk-supreme-court-to-rule-on-legal-definition-of-a-woman-gender-recognition-certificates" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.theguardian.com/law/live/2025/apr/16/uk-supreme-court-to-rule-on-legal-definition-of-a-woman-gender-recognition-certificates</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Actual Feminists Care About All Aspects of Women’s Rights]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=948</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 01:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=300">Myrth</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=948</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The National Organization for Women is so captured. Actual feminists have been outraged that Brock Turner got an extremely light sentence for rape. Actual feminists have also been outraged at men taking the podium (and sports scholarships) from women.<br />
<br />
Actual feminists can walk and chew gum at the same time. NOW? Not so much.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<div class="row mb-2">
	<div class="col-auto align-self-center">

<!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://clovenhooves.org/images/attachtypes/image.png" title="JPEG Image" style="height: 16px; width: 16px" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->
		
	</div>
	<div class="col align-self-center">
		<a href="attachment.php?aid=81" target="_blank" title="">IMG_1040.jpeg</a> <br />
		<span class="text-muted" style="font-size: 12px">Size: 285.39 KB / Downloads: 252</span>
	</div>
</div>
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The National Organization for Women is so captured. Actual feminists have been outraged that Brock Turner got an extremely light sentence for rape. Actual feminists have also been outraged at men taking the podium (and sports scholarships) from women.<br />
<br />
Actual feminists can walk and chew gum at the same time. NOW? Not so much.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<div class="row mb-2">
	<div class="col-auto align-self-center">

<!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://clovenhooves.org/images/attachtypes/image.png" title="JPEG Image" style="height: 16px; width: 16px" border="0" alt=".jpeg" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->
		
	</div>
	<div class="col align-self-center">
		<a href="attachment.php?aid=81" target="_blank" title="">IMG_1040.jpeg</a> <br />
		<span class="text-muted" style="font-size: 12px">Size: 285.39 KB / Downloads: 252</span>
	</div>
</div>
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Scottish Supreme Court hearing case on definition of a woman]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=412</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">Clover</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=412</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[BBC News, November 26 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgv8v5ge37o" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgv8v5ge37o</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Judges at the Supreme Court are considering how women are defined in law in a landmark case brought by Scottish campaigners.<br />
<br />
It is the culmination of a long-running legal dispute which started with a relatively niche piece of legislation at the Scottish Parliament, but which could have big UK-wide implications.<br />
<br />
It will set out exactly how the law is meant to treat trans people, and what it really means to go through the gender recognition process.</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>The case started on Tuesday, with judges hearing from lawyers acting on behalf of the For Women Scotland campaign group, which is concerned about the potential impact of trans rights on women's rights.<br />
<br />
The Scottish government's legal representatives will address the court on Wednesday, before the judges retire to consider their ruling - which could take several weeks.<br />
<br />
At the most basic level, the case centres on what “sex” actually means in law.</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[BBC News, November 26 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgv8v5ge37o" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckgv8v5ge37o</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Judges at the Supreme Court are considering how women are defined in law in a landmark case brought by Scottish campaigners.<br />
<br />
It is the culmination of a long-running legal dispute which started with a relatively niche piece of legislation at the Scottish Parliament, but which could have big UK-wide implications.<br />
<br />
It will set out exactly how the law is meant to treat trans people, and what it really means to go through the gender recognition process.</blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>The case started on Tuesday, with judges hearing from lawyers acting on behalf of the For Women Scotland campaign group, which is concerned about the potential impact of trans rights on women's rights.<br />
<br />
The Scottish government's legal representatives will address the court on Wednesday, before the judges retire to consider their ruling - which could take several weeks.<br />
<br />
At the most basic level, the case centres on what “sex” actually means in law.</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rape crisis centre failed to protect women-only spaces]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=260</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">Clover</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=260</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[BBC News, September 12 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clynyky7kj9o" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clynyky7kj9o</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Rape survivors are no longer being referred to a support service in Edinburgh after a review found it failed to protect women-only spaces.<br />
<br />
It also stated that centre's chief executive officer – a trans woman – failed to behave professionally and did not understand the limits of her authority.<br />
<br />
The report, commissioned by Rape Crisis Scotland, found that Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre had not put survivors first or adhered to national service standards.<br />
<br />
The charity has paused new referrals to the centre and said it was "extremely concerned" that women-only spaces had not been provided for 16 months.</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/602977/edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-failed-to-protect-women-only-spaces" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Discussion on Ovarit.</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[BBC News, September 12 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clynyky7kj9o" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clynyky7kj9o</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Rape survivors are no longer being referred to a support service in Edinburgh after a review found it failed to protect women-only spaces.<br />
<br />
It also stated that centre's chief executive officer – a trans woman – failed to behave professionally and did not understand the limits of her authority.<br />
<br />
The report, commissioned by Rape Crisis Scotland, found that Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre had not put survivors first or adhered to national service standards.<br />
<br />
The charity has paused new referrals to the centre and said it was "extremely concerned" that women-only spaces had not been provided for 16 months.</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/602977/edinburgh-rape-crisis-centre-failed-to-protect-women-only-spaces" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Discussion on Ovarit.</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Self-ID in Germany (Selbstbestimmungsgesetz, SBGG)]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=225</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 13:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=9">Lily</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=225</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[In june 2024, Germany passed a law that will allow trans-identified individuals to legally change their sex through declaration at a registry office (Standesamt) (§ 2 SBGG). This new law eliminates the requirement of having undergone sex-reassignment surgery in order to legally change one's sex, as was previously the case under the Transsexuellengesetz. <br />
<br />
This law also allows parents to legally change their child's sex (as long as the child is under 14 years old) and provides that parents of children above the age of five need their child's consent for the legal change -- indicating that children younger than five can have their sex legally changed by their parents without their input entirely. (§ 3 SBGG)<br />
<br />
§ 7 SBGG says that men who change their legal sex to female will count as female to fill women quotas, whereas for the military they're still men according to § 9 SBGG. <br />
<br />
They also established a fine for revealing the previous legal sex or previous name of someone who changed their legal sex of up to 10.000 euros (§§ 13, 14 SBGG), but one of the exceptions for this fine is if the person sharing or seeking the information has a "legal interest" in doing so. I'm not sure how widely this exception will be applied.<br />
<br />
<br />
Unfortunately i couldn't find an English translation, but the full German law text is here:<br />
<a href="https://www.recht.bund.de/bgbl/1/2024/206/regelungstext.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=3" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.recht.bund.de/bgbl/1/2024/206/regelungstext.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=3</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In june 2024, Germany passed a law that will allow trans-identified individuals to legally change their sex through declaration at a registry office (Standesamt) (§ 2 SBGG). This new law eliminates the requirement of having undergone sex-reassignment surgery in order to legally change one's sex, as was previously the case under the Transsexuellengesetz. <br />
<br />
This law also allows parents to legally change their child's sex (as long as the child is under 14 years old) and provides that parents of children above the age of five need their child's consent for the legal change -- indicating that children younger than five can have their sex legally changed by their parents without their input entirely. (§ 3 SBGG)<br />
<br />
§ 7 SBGG says that men who change their legal sex to female will count as female to fill women quotas, whereas for the military they're still men according to § 9 SBGG. <br />
<br />
They also established a fine for revealing the previous legal sex or previous name of someone who changed their legal sex of up to 10.000 euros (§§ 13, 14 SBGG), but one of the exceptions for this fine is if the person sharing or seeking the information has a "legal interest" in doing so. I'm not sure how widely this exception will be applied.<br />
<br />
<br />
Unfortunately i couldn't find an English translation, but the full German law text is here:<br />
<a href="https://www.recht.bund.de/bgbl/1/2024/206/regelungstext.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=3" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.recht.bund.de/bgbl/1/2024/206/regelungstext.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=3</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Biden’s Title IX Rewrite Rejected by 6th Circuit: Americans Are ‘Standing Up’ for Women]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=219</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">Clover</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=219</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The Washington Stand, July 18 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://washingtonstand.com/news/bidens-title-ix-rewrite-rejected-by-6th-circuit-americans-are-standing-up-for-women" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://washingtonstand.com/news/bidens-title-ix-rewrite-rejected-by-6th-circuit-americans-are-standing-up-for-women</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[Biden's Title IX rewrite was o]riginally set to take effect in August, so far, the rewrite is now temporarily blocked from moving forward in at least 10 states — Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. And it seems the tide against the rewrite seems to have strengthened after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit decided on Wednesday to reject the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule.</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/581631/bidens-title-ix-rewrite-rejected-by-6th-circuit-americans-are-standing-up-for-wo" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Discussion on Ovarit.</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Note:</span> The Washington Stand appears to be a Christian and/or conservative news source.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Washington Stand, July 18 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://washingtonstand.com/news/bidens-title-ix-rewrite-rejected-by-6th-circuit-americans-are-standing-up-for-women" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://washingtonstand.com/news/bidens-title-ix-rewrite-rejected-by-6th-circuit-americans-are-standing-up-for-women</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[Biden's Title IX rewrite was o]riginally set to take effect in August, so far, the rewrite is now temporarily blocked from moving forward in at least 10 states — Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. And it seems the tide against the rewrite seems to have strengthened after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit decided on Wednesday to reject the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule.</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/581631/bidens-title-ix-rewrite-rejected-by-6th-circuit-americans-are-standing-up-for-wo" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Discussion on Ovarit.</a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Note:</span> The Washington Stand appears to be a Christian and/or conservative news source.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NH governor signs bills to ban boys who pretend to be girls from girls sports, restrict "gender surgeries" for minors]]></title>
			<link>https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=218</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 18:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://clovenhooves.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=6">Clover</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://clovenhooves.org/showthread.php?tid=218</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[NHPR, July 19 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.nhpr.org/politics/2024-07-19/sununu-signs-bills-to-ban-trans-girls-from-girls-sports-restrict-gender-affirming-surgeries" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.nhpr.org/politics/2024-07-19/sununu-signs-bills-to-ban-trans-girls-from-girls-sports-restrict-gender-affirming-surgeries</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu signed a series of bills that will [ban] [boys who pretend to be girls] in grades 5 to 12 from participating in girls’ sports teams and prohibiting medical professionals from carrying out ["sex change"] surgeries for minors.<br />
<br />
Sununu also signed a bill that would allow parents to opt their children out of any public school instruction that features LGBTQ topics – and would require teachers to give parents at least two weeks notice before teaching such material.<br />
<br />
But he vetoed a fourth bill, House Bill 396, that would have allowed businesses and government entities to discriminate on the basis of biological sex in bathrooms, locker rooms, sporting events, jails and prisons, mental health hospitals and treatment facilities.</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/580571/n-h-governor-signs-bill-barring-transgender-girls-from-girls-sports-vetoes-broad" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Discussion on Ovarit.</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[NHPR, July 19 2024.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.nhpr.org/politics/2024-07-19/sununu-signs-bills-to-ban-trans-girls-from-girls-sports-restrict-gender-affirming-surgeries" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.nhpr.org/politics/2024-07-19/sununu-signs-bills-to-ban-trans-girls-from-girls-sports-restrict-gender-affirming-surgeries</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu signed a series of bills that will [ban] [boys who pretend to be girls] in grades 5 to 12 from participating in girls’ sports teams and prohibiting medical professionals from carrying out ["sex change"] surgeries for minors.<br />
<br />
Sununu also signed a bill that would allow parents to opt their children out of any public school instruction that features LGBTQ topics – and would require teachers to give parents at least two weeks notice before teaching such material.<br />
<br />
But he vetoed a fourth bill, House Bill 396, that would have allowed businesses and government entities to discriminate on the basis of biological sex in bathrooms, locker rooms, sporting events, jails and prisons, mental health hospitals and treatment facilities.</blockquote>
<br />
<a href="https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/580571/n-h-governor-signs-bill-barring-transgender-girls-from-girls-sports-vetoes-broad" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Discussion on Ovarit.</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>