Kirk thoughts

clovenhooves The Personal Is Political General Kirk thoughts

Kirk thoughts

Print Thread

Pages (2): Previous 1 2

nina from canada eh

Sep 22 2025, 2:25 PM

#11

(Sep 20 2025, 5:23 PM)Elsacat 'No evidence' found yet of ties between Charlie Kirk's shooting and left-wing groups, officials say https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/no-evidence-charlie-kirk-shooting-left-wing-groups-rcna232513

Starting to wonder how much of this might have been rebellion against/anger toward his family, with Charlie Kirk being a representative of their thoughts, instead of him being radicalized into left-wing extremism in general. What if who he really wanted to shoot was his father or his whole family, but he didn't have it in him to do that, so he picked someone who he knew they liked or who said the same things.

Alternately, he could have really disliked Kirk without being a left-wing extremist, despite the right's best effort to paint anyone who dislikes Kirk's viewpoints as extremist and dangerous.

indeed. many are lone gun shooters who do not need a group to be the patsy for. The Norway shooter acted alone, even tho he was in groupthink mentality.

nina from canada eh

Sep 22 2025, 2:25 PM #11

(Sep 20 2025, 5:23 PM)Elsacat 'No evidence' found yet of ties between Charlie Kirk's shooting and left-wing groups, officials say https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/no-evidence-charlie-kirk-shooting-left-wing-groups-rcna232513

Starting to wonder how much of this might have been rebellion against/anger toward his family, with Charlie Kirk being a representative of their thoughts, instead of him being radicalized into left-wing extremism in general. What if who he really wanted to shoot was his father or his whole family, but he didn't have it in him to do that, so he picked someone who he knew they liked or who said the same things.

Alternately, he could have really disliked Kirk without being a left-wing extremist, despite the right's best effort to paint anyone who dislikes Kirk's viewpoints as extremist and dangerous.

indeed. many are lone gun shooters who do not need a group to be the patsy for. The Norway shooter acted alone, even tho he was in groupthink mentality.

nina from canada eh

Sep 22 2025, 2:27 PM

#12

(Sep 20 2025, 10:18 PM)Impress Polly This is as straightforward as it gets. Gay guy kills dickwad xenophobe Charlie Kook, in his own words because he (Kirk) is a xenophobic hater and brands him a fascist with the bullet casings that were definitely "not" funny or clever in any way. It's an open and shut case and frankly I feel nothing about it all except the irritation that the shooting has so quickly unleashed an asinine wave of right wing wokeness (aggressive censorship of "hate speech" and "disinformation" that's directed against favored demographics being what I mean by that in this case) that threatens to affect my presence elsewhere on the social medias. Just when you thought things were opening up more, BAM!, here we are all over again with what's probably destined to be a whole second generation of this bullshit, but just now in an even dumber packaging than the last time, UUUUGH!!! And none of these fucktards even notice the irony in that, like in lionizing Kirk as this great free speech champion on the one hand while simultaneously weaponizing his death to silence all their critics on the other. It just shows who they really believe in free speech for.

If this is supposed to be the new generation's 9/11, it's the dumbest variation ever. Kirk was just some asswipe podcast moid who helped Trump get elected our tinpot dictator and the culture is making him out to be a saint. My favorite aspect of it all is those creepy-ass pictures circulating on social media depicting Kirk in heaven with Jesus (wherein, y'know, even decked out in heavenly white garb and situated amongst the clouds, he still looks like kind of a jerk). I've never been so glad to be going to hell!

Sorry if I seem callous, but I find it tough to empathize with someone who dedicated his entire adult life to actively trying to reduce my rights and silence survivors of sexual predators (in the name of free speech no less). It's starting to feel like this is fucking North Korea and a member of the dear Kim dynasty has just passed away: like I'm at one of their casket tours, being battered and ordered to CRY LOUDER!!! Apparently it doesn't matter that he dedicated his entire life to hating people like me, I must nonetheless love him anyway. sighs Even in death, he's adding to my personal misery for shit sakes. No, I will not be honoring the newly-declared National Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day next month.

to compare a single man's murder to 9/11 a religious based terrorism against western culture is really over reaching for victimness.

nina from canada eh

Sep 22 2025, 2:27 PM #12

(Sep 20 2025, 10:18 PM)Impress Polly This is as straightforward as it gets. Gay guy kills dickwad xenophobe Charlie Kook, in his own words because he (Kirk) is a xenophobic hater and brands him a fascist with the bullet casings that were definitely "not" funny or clever in any way. It's an open and shut case and frankly I feel nothing about it all except the irritation that the shooting has so quickly unleashed an asinine wave of right wing wokeness (aggressive censorship of "hate speech" and "disinformation" that's directed against favored demographics being what I mean by that in this case) that threatens to affect my presence elsewhere on the social medias. Just when you thought things were opening up more, BAM!, here we are all over again with what's probably destined to be a whole second generation of this bullshit, but just now in an even dumber packaging than the last time, UUUUGH!!! And none of these fucktards even notice the irony in that, like in lionizing Kirk as this great free speech champion on the one hand while simultaneously weaponizing his death to silence all their critics on the other. It just shows who they really believe in free speech for.

If this is supposed to be the new generation's 9/11, it's the dumbest variation ever. Kirk was just some asswipe podcast moid who helped Trump get elected our tinpot dictator and the culture is making him out to be a saint. My favorite aspect of it all is those creepy-ass pictures circulating on social media depicting Kirk in heaven with Jesus (wherein, y'know, even decked out in heavenly white garb and situated amongst the clouds, he still looks like kind of a jerk). I've never been so glad to be going to hell!

Sorry if I seem callous, but I find it tough to empathize with someone who dedicated his entire adult life to actively trying to reduce my rights and silence survivors of sexual predators (in the name of free speech no less). It's starting to feel like this is fucking North Korea and a member of the dear Kim dynasty has just passed away: like I'm at one of their casket tours, being battered and ordered to CRY LOUDER!!! Apparently it doesn't matter that he dedicated his entire life to hating people like me, I must nonetheless love him anyway. sighs Even in death, he's adding to my personal misery for shit sakes. No, I will not be honoring the newly-declared National Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day next month.

to compare a single man's murder to 9/11 a religious based terrorism against western culture is really over reaching for victimness.

bellatrixthewitch
🧛‍♀️𝕿𝖗𝖔𝖕𝖎𝖉𝖆𝖗𝖐 🦇🧬 𝕬𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖘𝖙 🧬 ✊🏾𝔚𝔬𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔦𝔰𝔱 👩🏾‍🦱

Sep 26 2025, 11:58 AM

#13

(Sep 26 2025, 11:57 AM)bellatrixthewitch Charlie Kirk was never the champion of free speech. JK Rowling is the real champion of free speech. But since she support radical feminism and conservatives hate any type of feminism. Men of both sides ignore her or just hate her. Matt Walsh openly stated he hates feminism. Also he never wanted to debate with JK Rowling because he knows he doesn't have the guts to debate her. Because it will go against the narrative conservatives are trying to push into everybody.

Edited Sep 26 2025, 11:58 AM by bellatrixthewitch.

bellatrixthewitch

🧛‍♀️𝕿𝖗𝖔𝖕𝖎𝖉𝖆𝖗𝖐 🦇🧬 𝕬𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖎𝖘𝖙 🧬 ✊🏾𝔚𝔬𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔦𝔰𝔱 👩🏾‍🦱

Sep 26 2025, 11:58 AM #13

(Sep 26 2025, 11:57 AM)bellatrixthewitch Charlie Kirk was never the champion of free speech. JK Rowling is the real champion of free speech. But since she support radical feminism and conservatives hate any type of feminism. Men of both sides ignore her or just hate her. Matt Walsh openly stated he hates feminism. Also he never wanted to debate with JK Rowling because he knows he doesn't have the guts to debate her. Because it will go against the narrative conservatives are trying to push into everybody.

nina from canada eh

Sep 26 2025, 6:52 PM

#14

(Sep 26 2025, 11:58 AM)bellatrixthewitch
(Sep 26 2025, 11:57 AM)bellatrixthewitch Charlie Kirk was never the champion of free speech. JK Rowling is the real champion of free speech. But since she support radical feminism and conservatives hate any type of feminism. Men of both sides ignore her or just hate her. Matt Walsh openly stated he hates feminism. Also he never wanted to debate with JK Rowling because he knows he doesn't have the guts to debate her. Because it will go against the narrative conservatives are trying to push into everybody.

Walsh's sexism does not differ from trans sexism either...

nina from canada eh

Sep 26 2025, 6:52 PM #14

(Sep 26 2025, 11:58 AM)bellatrixthewitch
(Sep 26 2025, 11:57 AM)bellatrixthewitch Charlie Kirk was never the champion of free speech. JK Rowling is the real champion of free speech. But since she support radical feminism and conservatives hate any type of feminism. Men of both sides ignore her or just hate her. Matt Walsh openly stated he hates feminism. Also he never wanted to debate with JK Rowling because he knows he doesn't have the guts to debate her. Because it will go against the narrative conservatives are trying to push into everybody.

Walsh's sexism does not differ from trans sexism either...

dobby

Sep 27 2025, 11:45 AM

#15

(Sep 20 2025, 10:18 PM)Impress Polly This is as straightforward as it gets. Gay guy kills dickwad xenophobe Charlie Kook, in his own words because he (Kirk) is a xenophobic hater and brands him a fascist with the bullet casings that were definitely "not" funny or clever in any way. It's an open and shut case and frankly I feel nothing about it all except the irritation that the shooting has so quickly unleashed an asinine wave of right wing wokeness (aggressive censorship of "hate speech" and "disinformation" that's directed against favored demographics being what I mean by that in this case) that threatens to affect my presence elsewhere on the social medias. Just when you thought things were opening up more, BAM!, here we are all over again with what's probably destined to be a whole second generation of this bullshit, but just now in an even dumber packaging than the last time, UUUUGH!!! And none of these fucktards even notice the irony in that, like in lionizing Kirk as this great free speech champion on the one hand while simultaneously weaponizing his death to silence all their critics on the other. It just shows who they really believe in free speech for.

If this is supposed to be the new generation's 9/11, it's the dumbest variation ever. Kirk was just some asswipe podcast moid who helped Trump get elected our tinpot dictator and the culture is making him out to be a saint. My favorite aspect of it all is those creepy-ass pictures circulating on social media depicting Kirk in heaven with Jesus (wherein, y'know, even decked out in heavenly white garb and situated amongst the clouds, he still looks like kind of a jerk). I've never been so glad to be going to hell!

Sorry if I seem callous, but I find it tough to empathize with someone who dedicated his entire adult life to actively trying to reduce my rights and silence survivors of sexual predators (in the name of free speech no less). It's starting to feel like this is fucking North Korea and a member of the dear Kim dynasty has just passed away: like I'm at one of their casket tours, being battered and ordered to CRY LOUDER!!! Apparently it doesn't matter that he dedicated his entire life to hating people like me, I must nonetheless love him anyway. sighs Even in death, he's adding to my personal misery for shit sakes. No, I will not be honoring the newly-declared National Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day next month.

This is so well-said! I agree!

dobby

Sep 27 2025, 11:45 AM #15

(Sep 20 2025, 10:18 PM)Impress Polly This is as straightforward as it gets. Gay guy kills dickwad xenophobe Charlie Kook, in his own words because he (Kirk) is a xenophobic hater and brands him a fascist with the bullet casings that were definitely "not" funny or clever in any way. It's an open and shut case and frankly I feel nothing about it all except the irritation that the shooting has so quickly unleashed an asinine wave of right wing wokeness (aggressive censorship of "hate speech" and "disinformation" that's directed against favored demographics being what I mean by that in this case) that threatens to affect my presence elsewhere on the social medias. Just when you thought things were opening up more, BAM!, here we are all over again with what's probably destined to be a whole second generation of this bullshit, but just now in an even dumber packaging than the last time, UUUUGH!!! And none of these fucktards even notice the irony in that, like in lionizing Kirk as this great free speech champion on the one hand while simultaneously weaponizing his death to silence all their critics on the other. It just shows who they really believe in free speech for.

If this is supposed to be the new generation's 9/11, it's the dumbest variation ever. Kirk was just some asswipe podcast moid who helped Trump get elected our tinpot dictator and the culture is making him out to be a saint. My favorite aspect of it all is those creepy-ass pictures circulating on social media depicting Kirk in heaven with Jesus (wherein, y'know, even decked out in heavenly white garb and situated amongst the clouds, he still looks like kind of a jerk). I've never been so glad to be going to hell!

Sorry if I seem callous, but I find it tough to empathize with someone who dedicated his entire adult life to actively trying to reduce my rights and silence survivors of sexual predators (in the name of free speech no less). It's starting to feel like this is fucking North Korea and a member of the dear Kim dynasty has just passed away: like I'm at one of their casket tours, being battered and ordered to CRY LOUDER!!! Apparently it doesn't matter that he dedicated his entire life to hating people like me, I must nonetheless love him anyway. sighs Even in death, he's adding to my personal misery for shit sakes. No, I will not be honoring the newly-declared National Charlie Kirk Remembrance Day next month.

This is so well-said! I agree!

Pages (2): Previous 1 2

Print Thread

Recently Browsing
11 Guest(s)